Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Cameron, AZ 86020

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Coconino County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Cameron Trading Post
Source water
Groundwater
County
Coconino County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

1 system

Serves 1,270 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Cameron Trading Post

AZ0403006 · Groundwater · 1,270 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.91 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

147% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021

Violation history (53)
Imported violation history for Cameron Trading Post
RuleStatusPeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)UnaddressedJan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026
TTHMUnaddressedJan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Oct 17, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedJul 2, 2025 to Jul 23, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2025 to Sep 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedDec 20, 2024 to Jul 23, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Feb 12, 2026
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-basedResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Feb 12, 2026
ArsenicResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Nov 18, 2024
ChlorineResolvedAug 1, 2024 to Aug 31, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedJul 2, 2024 to Jul 23, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedApr 2, 2024 to Nov 18, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Sep 13, 2024
ArsenicResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedJan 2, 2024 to Jul 23, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedOct 2, 2023 to Nov 22, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedOct 2, 2023 to Nov 22, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedSep 2, 2023 to Oct 20, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedJul 29, 2023 to Oct 20, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedJul 2, 2023 to Jul 23, 2025
ChlorineResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Aug 29, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedMay 18, 2023 to Oct 20, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedMay 18, 2023 to Oct 20, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedApr 3, 2023 to Sep 15, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedApr 1, 2023 to Apr 30, 2023
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
ArsenicResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 2, 2022 to Sep 22, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
ArsenicResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
TTHMResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedSep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedAug 1, 2022 to Aug 31, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 22, 2023
ArsenicResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Aug 29, 2023
TTHMResolvedJun 1, 2022 to Aug 31, 2022
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJun 1, 2022 to Aug 31, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleHealth-basedResolvedApr 1, 2022 to May 1, 2022
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedMar 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022
TTHMResolvedMar 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022
ArsenicResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
TTHMResolvedDec 1, 2021 to Feb 28, 2022
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedDec 1, 2021 to Feb 28, 2022
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Hard

PPM

128.2

GPG

7.5

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

128.2 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

128.2

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

7.5

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

4

Nearest site

13.9 mi

Observation range

Aug 31, 2017–May 3, 2023

Regional evidence confidence

Moderate

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 03 079-10.81X09.20 (Spring).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 86020 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Cameron median

128 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 128.2–128.2 PPM

Arizona median

64 PPM

64 PPM higher

213 indexed ZIP readings · Range 33–2680 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Cameron

Is tap water safe in Cameron?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.