Skip to content

Independent water-data guide

Find your water hardness and your next step.

Find your water provider, check official hardness reports where available, and learn what to test at home. Start with your city or ZIP code.

Search by city or ZIP. Regional observations are kept separate from utility records and are never presented as household tap tests.

14,758

Local ZIP profiles

51

States and DC

10,714

Indexed communities

9,996

Profiles with regional evidence

Browse nationally

Start with your state

Every state and Washington, DC has a dedicated evidence hub with regional observations, possible utilities, limitations, and available ZIP profiles.

Regional hardness evidence by state

All 50 states plus DC. Color represents the median of available source-aligned regional observations, not treated tap water.

Select or focus a tile for details

● Soft, 0–60● Moderate, 61–120● Hard, 121–180● Very hard, 181+

State median

South Dakota

688

PPM as CaCO₃

Very hard

66 hardness readings across 246 local profiles.

Explore SD →

National snapshot

What the regional evidence looks like

The distribution below describes published profiles with an available source-aligned USGS hardness estimate. It is a summary of this index, not a population-weighted estimate of every US household.

204

National profile median PPM

0.8–2970

Observed profile range

Soft · 0–60 PPM

15%

1,505 profiles

Moderately hard · 61–120 PPM

16%

1,594 profiles

Hard · 121–180 PPM

15%

1,455 profiles

Very hard · 181+ PPM

54%

5,442 profiles

Compare places

Best-supported high-hardness regional evidence

This research comparison uses only source-aligned observations within 10 miles, with multiple sites and recent evidence. It does not rank utility-treated water.

Communities with the highest qualifying regional hardness evidence
RankCommunityHardnessGPGClassReport
#1

Fargo, ND

4 indexed ZIP readings

716 PPM41.9Very HardView →
#2

Richfield, WI

3 indexed ZIP readings

518 PPM30.3Very HardView →
#3

Independence, MO

7 indexed ZIP readings

487 PPM28.5Very HardView →
#4

Buckeye, AZ

3 indexed ZIP readings

481 PPM28.1Very HardView →
#5

Lansing, MI

6 indexed ZIP readings

418 PPM24.4Very HardView →
#6

Grand Junction, CO

4 indexed ZIP readings

399 PPM23.3Very HardView →
#7

Anderson, IN

3 indexed ZIP readings

387 PPM22.6Very HardView →
#8

Orlando, FL

13 indexed ZIP readings

374 PPM21.9Very HardView →
#9

Naples, FL

6 indexed ZIP readings

353 PPM20.6Very HardView →
#10

Fort Pierce, FL

5 indexed ZIP readings

348 PPM20.4Very HardView →
Review the complete research comparison →

Use the data well

From estimate to a sensible next step

A useful water decision separates mineral hardness, regulated contaminants, utility-wide reporting, and what is actually measured at your tap.

01

Find the local profile

Search by ZIP or city to see the available hardness estimate, source distance, utility association, and compliance context.

02

Check the evidence

Read the source dates and caveats. A nearby environmental sample and a utility-wide record answer different questions.

03

Test before treating

For health concerns or major equipment purchases, confirm conditions at the tap with a certified laboratory or current utility report.

Transparent by design

We show what the data can—and cannot—tell you.

Hard Water Index aggregates official public data. We retain source dates, matching methods, sample distance, missing values, and limitations instead of turning uncertainty into a confident claim.

Read the methodology
USGS
Nearby hardness observations and site metadata
EPA SDWIS
Public water systems and compliance history
US Census
ZCTA and place geography used for local pages
No invented zeros
Unavailable measurements stay unavailable

Water guides

Learn before you buy or treat

View all guides →