Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Cottonwood, AZ 86326
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Yavapai County.
1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
- Largest possible serving system
- Cottonwood Municipal Water Cw1
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Yavapai County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
9 systems
Serves 11,023 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Cottonwood Municipal Water Cw1
AZ0413025 · Groundwater · 11,023 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Arsenic
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.012 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.01 MG/L
120% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| ArsenicHealth-based | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021 |
| ArsenicHealth-based | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Mar 31, 2021 |
| ArsenicHealth-based | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Mar 31, 2021 |
Cottonwood Municipal Water Vv6
AZ0413106 · Groundwater · 4,509 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Nitrate | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021 |
Cottonwood Municipal Water Vv2
AZ0413104 · Groundwater · 2,893 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Cottonwood Municipal Water Vv3
AZ0413105 · Groundwater · 1,458 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (21)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Vinyl chloride | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Trichloroethylene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Benzene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Styrene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| DICHLOROMETHANE | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| CHLOROBENZENE | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Ethylbenzene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Toluene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Xylenes, Total | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
Verde Valley Manor
AZ0413127 · Groundwater · 275 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Dec 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Arsenic | Resolved | Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | May 1, 2022 to Aug 24, 2022 |
On The Greens
AZ0413268 · Groundwater · 173 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Arsenic
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.036 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.01 MG/L
360% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
Violation history (8)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| ArsenicHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026 |
| ArsenicHealth-based | Archived | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 14, 2025 |
| Arsenic | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 23, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2021 to Dec 6, 2021 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
Acme Water - Blue Hills
AZ0413055 · Groundwater · 138 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Arsenic
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.011 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.01 MG/L
110% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| ArsenicHealth-based | Resolved | Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025 |
Rio Verde Rv Park
AZ0413425 · Groundwater · 90 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0063 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
42% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Jan 31, 2024 |
C-Oasis Park
AZ0413423 · Groundwater · 54 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.007 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
47% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Nitrate
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 21 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 10 MG/L
210% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| NitrateHealth-based | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
197
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
197
GPG
11.5
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
197 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
197
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
11.5
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
3
Nearest site
5.6 mi
Observation range
Jun 27, 2016–May 1, 2024
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: A-16-03 15CAC1 (Spring).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 86326 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Cottonwood median
197 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 197–197 PPM
Arizona median
64 PPM
133 PPM higher213 indexed ZIP readings · Range 33–2680 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Cottonwood
Is tap water safe in Cottonwood?+
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.