Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Red Rock, AZ 85145
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Pinal County.
No active health-based violation reported
- Largest possible serving system
- Gw Santa Cruz Water Co - Red Rock
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Pinal County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
3 systems
Serves 3,813 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Gw Santa Cruz Water Co - Red Rock
AZ0411160 · Groundwater · 3,813 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2023 to Feb 27, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
Picacho Peak Rv Resort
AZ0411547 · Groundwater · 400 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (15)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jul 29, 2025 to Mar 11, 2026 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 25, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Dec 20, 2024 to Jun 18, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Jan 6, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Jan 6, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Jan 31, 2025 |
| Nitrate | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Feb 1, 2024 to Feb 29, 2024 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Nitrate | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 19, 2022 to Mar 13, 2024 |
| Nitrate | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Nitrate | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
Davis Ranch Land Owners
AZ0411090 · Groundwater · 40 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (8)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 25, 2025 to Jan 14, 2026 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Unaddressed | Jul 2, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2024 to Dec 20, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Aug 1, 2024 to Dec 9, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Feb 27, 2024 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
209.5
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
209.5
GPG
12.3
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
209.5 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
209.5
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
12.3
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
8
Nearest site
21.8 mi
Observation range
Jan 11, 2016–Aug 16, 2016
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: D-13-12 03BCC1 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 85145 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Red Rock median
174 PPM
36 PPM higher2 indexed ZIP readings · Range 138–209.5 PPM
Arizona median
64 PPM
146 PPM higher213 indexed ZIP readings · Range 33–2680 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
Use the current Consumer Confidence Report for treated-water results and official notices.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
More local profiles in Red Rock
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Red Rock
Is tap water safe in Red Rock?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.