City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Danbury, Connecticut.
Median indexed hardness
83PPM
2 indexed ZIPs
Range 83–83.6 PPM
City summary
Danbury has 2 published ZIP profiles across Fairfield County. The indexed median is 83 PPM, compared with 53 PPM across Connecticut.
Among the 52 Connecticutcities with an indexed median, Danbury ranks #14from highest to lowest. Across all 98 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 42.8to 114 PPM.
The 83–83.6 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 4, 2016 to Jun 3, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID CT0340011
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0090011
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340171
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340111
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340191
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340251
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340151
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340211
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340231
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID CT0340081
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | CT0340141 | Jan 1, 2026 | Unaddressed |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | CT0347031 | Dec 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | CT0340181 | Jul 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | CT0340141 | Jul 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Lead and Copper Rule | CT0340151 | Apr 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| CARBON, TOTAL | CT0090011 | Jan 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| CARBON, TOTAL | CT0090011 | Jan 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Arsenic | CT0090011 | Jan 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Cadmium | CT0090011 | Jan 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Chromium | CT0090011 | Jan 1, 2025 | Archived |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 83 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.