Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Georgetown, DE 19947
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Sussex County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Georgetown Water Department
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Sussex County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
10 systems
Serves 7,259 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Georgetown Water Department
DE0000592 · Groundwater · 7,259 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Stockley Center
DE0000276 · Groundwater · 749 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0016 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
11% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 2.648 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
204% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 4, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Mar 6, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Jul 12, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Aug 16, 2021 |
Sand Hill Acres
DE0000115 · Groundwater · 384 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0137 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
91% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 1994 |
Avalon Woods Owners Assoc Inc
DE0000885 · Groundwater · 306 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Nitrate
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 11.95 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 10 MG/L
119% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 4, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| NitrateHealth-based | Resolved | Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 4, 2025 |
County Seat Gardens
DE0000901 · Groundwater · 297 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0054 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
36% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.9405 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
149% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2005
Violation history (7)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Jan 29, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Oct 20, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Apr 25, 2023 to Jun 11, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Oct 20, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 20, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 1994 |
Country Club Village (tui)
DE00A0679 · Groundwater · 192 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0013 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
9% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Willow Lake Pump District
DE00A0757 · Groundwater · 120 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Sand Hill Mobile Home Park
DE0000982 · Groundwater · 120 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.87 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
144% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2005 to Jun 30, 2005
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Blue Heron Estates
DE00A0680 · Groundwater · 111 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.001 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
7% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Fish Hook Mobile Home Park
DE0000260 · Groundwater · 72 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0037 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
25% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
Nitrate
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 18.15 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 10 MG/L
182% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| NitrateHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026 |
| NitrateHealth-based | Resolved | Jan 17, 2023 to Mar 9, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Oct 31, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to May 8, 2023 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
45.8
PPM as CaCO₃
Soft
PPM
45.8
GPG
2.7
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
45.8 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
45.8
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
2.7
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
98
Nearest site
2 mi
Observation range
Apr 11, 2016–Aug 28, 2024
Regional evidence confidence
High
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: Georgetown 1 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 19947 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Georgetown median
46 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 45.8–45.8 PPM
Delaware median
63 PPM
17 PPM lower48 indexed ZIP readings · Range 31.1–129 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Georgetown
Is tap water safe in Georgetown?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.