City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Apopka, Florida.
Median indexed hardness
357PPM
3 indexed ZIPs
Range 353–356.5 PPM
City summary
Apopka has 3 published ZIP profiles across Orange County. The indexed median is 357 PPM, compared with 280 PPM across Florida.
Among the 290 Floridacities with an indexed median, Apopka ranks #38from highest to lowest. Across all 603 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 20to 374.5 PPM.
The 353–356.5 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
3 of 3 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 13, 2016 to May 27, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID FL3480200
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3590785
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3481093
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3481501
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3590615
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3590069
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3480114
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3481420
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3480502
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3480681
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
1 unique active health-based record appears among associated systems. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | FL3481501 | Aug 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL3481501 | Aug 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3481093 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3481501 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3590615 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3590069 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3480114 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3481420 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3480502 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL3480681 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 357 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.