City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Inverness, Florida.
Median indexed hardness
249PPM
2 indexed ZIPs
Range 193–305 PPM
City summary
Inverness has 2 published ZIP profiles across Citrus County. The indexed median is 249 PPM, compared with 280 PPM across Florida.
Among the 290 Floridacities with an indexed median, Inverness ranks #170from highest to lowest. Across all 603 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 20to 374.5 PPM.
The 193–305 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 13, 2016 to May 27, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID FL6090861
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6091422
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6091554
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6090674
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6094933
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6090609
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6090875
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6090532
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6094970
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6090729
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | FL6091422 | Mar 1, 2026 | Unaddressed |
| E. COLI | FL6091422 | Mar 1, 2026 | Unaddressed |
| E. COLI | FL6094933 | Feb 1, 2026 | Archived |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL6094933 | Feb 1, 2026 | Archived |
| E. COLI | FL6090875 | Dec 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL6090875 | Dec 1, 2025 | Archived |
| E. COLI | FL6090532 | Dec 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL6090532 | Dec 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| E. COLI | FL6090729 | Dec 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL6090729 | Dec 1, 2025 | Resolved |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 249 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.