City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Lady Lake, Florida.
Median indexed hardness
347PPM
2 indexed ZIPs
Range 345–349 PPM
City summary
Lady Lake has 2 published ZIP profiles across Lake County and Marion County. The indexed median is 347 PPM, compared with 280 PPM across Florida.
Among the 290 Floridacities with an indexed median, Lady Lake ranks #83from highest to lowest. Across all 603 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 20to 374.5 PPM.
The 345–349 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 13, 2016 to May 27, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID FL3350942
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3350977
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3354010
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3354781
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL6605023
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3350152
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3350679
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3350544
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3350094
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID FL3354926
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
2 unique active health-based records appear among associated systems. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | FL3354781 | Sep 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL3354781 | Sep 1, 2025 | Archived |
| E. COLI | FL3350152 | Sep 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | FL6605023 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | FL6605023 | Feb 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | FL6605023 | Feb 1, 2025 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | FL3354926 | Feb 1, 2025 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | FL3354926 | Feb 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | FL3350679 | Nov 1, 2024 | Archived |
| E. COLI | FL3350679 | Nov 1, 2024 | Archived |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 347 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.