Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationRegional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Marion County.
Your tap water
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
10 systems
Serves 66,449 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
FL3420922 · Groundwater · 66,449 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
5% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Mar 1, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2015 |
FL6424619 · Groundwater · 22,383 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 1, 2025
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
FL6424652 · Groundwater · 7,467 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
33% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
FL3425127 · Groundwater · 4,784 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
12% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
FL3421098 · Groundwater · 2,498 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
8% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Archived | Jul 1, 2024 to Jul 31, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jan 5, 2024 to Mar 4, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023 |
| E. COLI | Resolved | Nov 1, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2008 |
FL3421560 · Groundwater · 2,202 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
5% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Archived | Mar 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule | Addressed | Jul 2, 2010 |
FL6424785 · Groundwater · 2,015 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
6% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Aug 1, 2025 to Aug 31, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Unaddressed | Feb 1, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Unaddressed | Feb 1, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Oct 20, 2022 |
FL6424076 · Groundwater · 1,859 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
21% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
FL3421314 · Groundwater · 1,460 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Archived | Sep 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025 |
| E. COLI | Archived | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 31, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Aug 1, 2024 to Aug 31, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 1, 2024 to Sep 5, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2006 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2004 |
FL3424620 · Groundwater · 1,218 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
130% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Dec 31, 1996 to Jun 30, 1997
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Unaddressed | Aug 1, 2025 |
| E. COLI | Resolved | Mar 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Mar 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
Hardness meter
283
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
283
GPG
16.5
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
283 PPM
Parts per million
283
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
16.5
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
1
Nearest site
0.4 mi
Observation range
Jan 16, 2026–Jan 16, 2026
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 912205 (OCALA WELL NO. 2 AAE0113) (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Ocala median
283 PPM
About the same6 indexed ZIP readings · Range 283–283 PPM
Florida median
280 PPM
About the same498 indexed ZIP readings · Range 42.2–2300 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.