Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationRegional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Volusia County.
Your tap water
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
2 systems
Serves 2,657 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
FL3641324 · Groundwater · 2,657 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
52% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Aug 10, 2024 to Feb 5, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Feb 5, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Aug 1, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Sep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| E. COLI | Archived | Sep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
FL3641308 · Groundwater · 100 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
19% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Unaddressed | Feb 1, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Unaddressed | Feb 1, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Mar 4, 2026 |
| E. COLI | Resolved | Sep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2002 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2002 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2001 |
Hardness meter
285
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
285
GPG
16.7
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
285 PPM
Parts per million
285
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
16.7
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
3
Nearest site
13.5 mi
Observation range
Nov 20, 2019–Jan 21, 2026
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: DELAND WELL NO. 7A (AAH1836) (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Pierson median
285 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 285–285 PPM
Florida median
280 PPM
5 PPM higher498 indexed ZIP readings · Range 42.2–2300 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.