City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Douglas, Georgia.
Median indexed hardness
131PPM
2 indexed ZIPs
Range 130.5–130.5 PPM
City summary
Douglas has 2 published ZIP profiles across Coffee County. The indexed median is 131 PPM, compared with 40 PPM across Georgia.
Among the 371 Georgiacities with an indexed median, Douglas ranks #112from highest to lowest. Across all 469 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 3to 207 PPM.
The 130.5–130.5 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Sep 24, 2019 to Mar 25, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID GA0690002
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690018
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690039
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690011
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690034
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690009
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690048
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690038
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690063
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID GA0690066
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | GA0690054 | Oct 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | GA0690054 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U | GA0690066 | Jan 1, 2025 | Resolved · health-based |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | GA0690054 | Jan 1, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | GA0690054 | Nov 1, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | GA0690018 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | GA0690009 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | GA0690048 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | GA0690063 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | GA0690066 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 131 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.