Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Ford, KS 67842

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Ford County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Ford, City Of
Source water
Groundwater
County
Ford County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

1 system

Serves 204 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Ford, City Of

KS2005709 · Groundwater · 204 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0023 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

15% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Nitrate

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation
Reported level
26 MG/L
Maximum contaminant level
10 MG/L

260% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026

Violation history (41)
Imported violation history for Ford, City Of
RuleStatusPeriod
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
NitrateArchivedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
NitrateArchivedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
NitrateArchivedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
NitrateArchivedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJul 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMay 1, 2025 to May 31, 2025
ChlorineResolvedMay 1, 2025 to May 31, 2025
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedOct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMar 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedOct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedMay 29, 2023 to Mar 12, 2024
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedApr 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
TTHMArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedNov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 31, 2022 to Mar 22, 2023
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 13, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMay 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 21, 2022
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedNov 1, 2021 to Nov 30, 2021
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 21, 2021
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Public NoticeResolvedMay 27, 2021 to Jun 1, 2021
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedApr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedFeb 1, 2021 to Feb 28, 2021
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Mar 16, 2021
NitrateHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2021 to Mar 31, 2021

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Very Hard

PPM

244

GPG

14.3

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

244 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

244

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

14.3

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

1

Nearest site

16.2 mi

Observation range

May 6, 2021–May 6, 2021

Regional evidence confidence

Low

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 28S 20W 10ACAC01 COS-1226 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 67842 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Ford median

244 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 244–244 PPM

Kansas median

291 PPM

47 PPM lower

303 indexed ZIP readings · Range 70.9–796 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Ford

Is tap water safe in Ford?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.