Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationRegional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Reno County.
Your tap water
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
4 systems
Serves 39,712 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
KS2015509 · Groundwater · 39,712 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
108% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2007
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Unaddressed | Jul 2, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Jun 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022 |
KS2015517 · Groundwater · 635 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
6% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Feb 27, 2025 |
KS2015508 · Groundwater · 260 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorine | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 2, 2021 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 2, 2021 |
KS2015510 · Groundwater · 150 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
200% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorine | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2026 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2026 |
| NitrateHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 18, 2026 |
| NitrateHealth-based | Archived | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Apr 16, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2021 to Jun 29, 2021 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | May 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 29, 2021 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Apr 30, 2021 |
Hardness meter
303.5
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
303.5
GPG
17.7
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
303.5 PPM
Parts per million
303.5
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
17.7
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
90
Nearest site
7.7 mi
Observation range
Jun 7, 2016–Jul 9, 2018
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 23S 06W 03AABA01 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Hutchinson median
299 PPM
5 PPM higher2 indexed ZIP readings · Range 293.5–303.5 PPM
Kansas median
291 PPM
13 PPM higher303 indexed ZIP readings · Range 70.9–796 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.