Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Mccracken, KS 67556

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Rush County.

No active health-based violation reported
Largest possible serving system
Mccracken, City Of
Source water
Groundwater
County
Rush County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

2 systems

Serves 154 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Mccracken, City Of

KS2016502 · Groundwater · 154 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0034 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

23% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (22)
Imported violation history for Mccracken, City Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedNov 1, 2025 to Nov 30, 2025
ChlorineResolvedNov 1, 2025 to Nov 30, 2025
ChlorineArchivedAug 1, 2025 to Aug 31, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleArchivedAug 1, 2025 to Aug 31, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSUnaddressedJul 2, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
ChlorineResolvedJun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedDec 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJun 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedNov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 14, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Oct 31, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-basedResolvedFeb 5, 2022 to Apr 13, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Mar 1, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Jul 31, 2021
ChlorineResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Aug 16, 2021
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ArchivedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
TTHMArchivedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Rush Co Rwd 1

KS2016509 · Groundwater · 150 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0039 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

26% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (31)
Imported violation history for Rush Co Rwd 1
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleUnaddressedJan 1, 2026
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 2, 2023
Public NoticeUnaddressedSep 24, 2023
Public NoticeUnaddressedJul 20, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedJul 1, 2023
Public NoticeUnaddressedMay 21, 2023
Public NoticeUnaddressedMay 21, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMay 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2023 to Jun 27, 2023
Public NoticeUnaddressedMar 1, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJun 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Apr 30, 2022
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Public NoticeResolvedMar 31, 2022 to Apr 1, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Aug 22, 2022
NitrateResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
BariumResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
CadmiumResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
MercuryResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Antimony, TotalResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
SeleniumResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
FluorideResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Combined UraniumResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)ResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Radium-226ResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Radium-228ResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Thallium, TotalResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
ArsenicResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Beryllium, TotalResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
ChromiumResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Very Hard

PPM

751.5

GPG

43.9

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

751.5 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

751.5

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

43.9

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

2

Nearest site

14.4 mi

Observation range

Aug 1, 2018–Aug 15, 2018

Regional evidence confidence

Low

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 15S 18W 26CDDA01 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 67556 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Mccracken median

752 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 751.5–751.5 PPM

Kansas median

291 PPM

461 PPM higher

303 indexed ZIP readings · Range 70.9–796 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Mccracken

Is tap water safe in Mccracken?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.