Hardness
Very Hard
387 PPM · 22.6 GPG
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Mcfarland, KS 66501
A source-transparent look at local hardness, associated public water systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Wabaunsee County.
No active health-based violation reported
- Primary matched system
- Mcfarland, City Of
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Wabaunsee County
- Profile updated
At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Compliance screen
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Lead 90th percentile
0.011 mg/L
73% of action level
Utility match
1 system
Serves 281 people system-wide
Hardness meter
How hard is the water?
Estimated local hardness
USGS hardness classification scale
387 PPM
Soft
0–59Moderate
60–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–59Moderate
60–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
387
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
22.6
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
What this means at home
At 387 PPM, mineral scale can build up on fixtures and heating elements, reduce soap lather, and leave visible spotting. Hardness is primarily an aesthetic and appliance concern—not itself a tap-water safety rating.
USGS sites used
7
Nearest site
11 mi
Observation range
Jul 18, 2018–Jul 31, 2024
Estimate confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest qualifying hardness observation at each nearby monitoring site. Nearest monitoring location: 10S 10E 03CCBC01 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗
Regional context
Is 66501 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Mcfarland median
387 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 387–387 PPM
Kansas median
289 PPM
98 PPM higher540 indexed ZIP readings · Range 72.2–707 PPM
EPA benchmark screen
Contaminant snapshot
Available numerical results from associated SDWIS community water systems, compared with the applicable action level or federal MCL. Federal measured-value coverage is incomplete.
1 pass
Lead (PB90)
0.011 mg/L
Reported Dec 31, 2023
Copper (CU90)
Not available
No numerical 90th-percentile result
Numerical coverage
1 comparable result
Missing values remain blank; absence is not treated as a pass.
Lead (90th percentile)
Measured in mg/L
Local 0.011
EPA limit 0.015
Share of EPA benchmark
100% line = listed limit
2026Q2
- All records
- 3
- Health-based
- 1
- Active health-based
- 0
| Contaminant or rule | System | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groundwater Rule | KS2019707 | Resolved | Nov 30, 2023through Feb 19, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-based | KS2019707 | Resolved | Aug 16, 2022through Sep 20, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | KS2019707 | Unaddressed | Dec 30, 2020 |
No reported violation does not prove that every contaminant was tested or absent; SDWIS measured values are incomplete and lag state records.
Solutions matcher
Your personalized water action plan
Matched to Mcfarland ZIP 66501 using 387 PPM nearby hardness and 1 reported measurement benchmarks.
Scale protection
High-Capacity Whole House Water Softener
387 PPM is 3× the high-hardness trigger used by this matcher.
Designed to reduce scale on fixtures, water heaters, glassware, and plumbing throughout the home.
Compare whole-house systemsAffiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases, at no added cost to you. Product matching is educational and does not replace certified water testing.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Mcfarland
Is tap water safe in Mcfarland?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Nearby USGS observations produce an estimate of 387 PPM, or 22.6 grains per gallon, classified as very hard. This is not a household tap measurement.
Do I need a water softener?+
At 387 PPM, a correctly sized whole-house softener can reduce scale and hard-water spotting. It does not replace contaminant filtration.