Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Wellington, KS 67152

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Sumner County.

No active health-based violation reported
Largest possible serving system
Wellington, City Of
Source water
Surface water
County
Sumner County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

4 systems

Serves 7,664 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Wellington, City Of

KS2019119 · Surface water · 7,664 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Wellington, City Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Apr 1, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Oct 31, 2022

Sumner Co Rwd 2

KS2019107 · Surface water · 490 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0011 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (9)
Imported violation history for Sumner Co Rwd 2
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Jan 31, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleUnaddressedJan 1, 2025
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Jan 31, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSUnaddressedOct 17, 2024
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Oct 31, 2023
ChlorineResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Nov 1, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jul 18, 2022

Sumner Co Rwd 1

KS2019106 · Surface water · 280 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0053 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

35% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Sumner Co Rwd 3

KS2019105 · Surface water · 80 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
8.0e-4 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

5% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for Sumner Co Rwd 3
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Feb 19, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Nov 20, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jul 12, 2022

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Moderately Hard

PPM

70.9

GPG

4.1

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

70.9 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

70.9

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

4.1

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

1

Nearest site

24.3 mi

Observation range

Aug 15, 2024–Aug 15, 2024

Regional evidence confidence

Low

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: McConnell C at Oliver St, Wichita, KS (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 67152 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Wellington median

71 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 70.9–70.9 PPM

Kansas median

291 PPM

220 PPM lower

303 indexed ZIP readings · Range 70.9–796 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Wellington

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Wellington reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Wellington

Is tap water safe in Wellington?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.