Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationRegional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Ionia County.
Your tap water
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
2 systems
Serves 3,883 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
MI0005530 · Groundwater · 3,883 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
20% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
104% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2006 to Dec 31, 2008
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Jul 2, 2025 to Dec 19, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 16, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Jul 8, 2021 |
MI0000794 · Groundwater · 96 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
237% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2017 to Jun 30, 2017
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 11, 2025 to Nov 12, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 29, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 29, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Oct 27, 2022 |
| Combined Radium (-226 and -228) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 11, 2021 to Dec 28, 2021 |
Hardness meter
435
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
435
GPG
25.4
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
435 PPM
Parts per million
435
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
25.4
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
6
Nearest site
22.4 mi
Observation range
Jul 6, 2016–Oct 11, 2023
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: EATON 2-4 PAS-04 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Portland median
435 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 435–435 PPM
Michigan median
283 PPM
152 PPM higher280 indexed ZIP readings · Range 51.6–479 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.