Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Walls, MS 38641

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Desoto County.

No active health-based violation reported
Largest possible serving system
Walls Water Assn- Lake Forest
Source water
Groundwater
County
Desoto County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

2 systems

Serves 9,298 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Walls Water Assn- Lake Forest

MS0170043 · Groundwater · 9,298 people served system-wide

A municipal system, in-state city, and served county all agree with this Census ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
7.0e-4 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

5% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (4)
Imported violation history for Walls Water Assn- Lake Forest
RuleStatusPeriod
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Walls Water Association

MS0170019 · Groundwater · 2,999 people served system-wide

A municipal system, in-state city, and served county all agree with this Census ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
6.0e-4 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

4% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (4)
Imported violation history for Walls Water Association
RuleStatusPeriod
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Moderately Hard

PPM

69.5

GPG

4.1

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

69.5 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

69.5

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

4.1

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

51

Nearest site

7.9 mi

Observation range

Apr 26, 2017–Jun 4, 2026

Regional evidence confidence

High

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: SH:J-139 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 38641 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Walls median

67 PPM

About the same

2 indexed ZIP readings · Range 64.2–69.5 PPM

Mississippi median

56 PPM

14 PPM higher

72 indexed ZIP readings · Range 0.8–451 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Walls

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Walls reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Walls

Is tap water safe in Walls?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.