Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Baker, MT 59313

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Fallon County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Baker City Of
Source water
Groundwater
County
Fallon County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

3 systems

Serves 1,858 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Baker City Of

MT0000021 · Groundwater · 1,858 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (77)
Imported violation history for Baker City Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Oct 6, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJul 1, 2025 to Jul 31, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2024 to Feb 4, 2025
EndrinResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
ToxapheneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
DalaponResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
OXAMYLResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
SimazineResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
DinosebResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
LASSOResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
2,4-DResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
ChlordaneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
HeptachlorResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
PentachlorophenolResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
2,4,5-TPResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
AtrazineResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
MethoxychlorResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
PicloramResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
CarbofuranResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
EndrinResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
ToxapheneResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
DalaponResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
OXAMYLResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
DinosebResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
CarbofuranResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
AtrazineResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
ChlordaneResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)ResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
PicloramResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
SimazineResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
2,4-DResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
2,4,5-TPResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
MethoxychlorResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
HeptachlorResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
LASSOResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
PentachlorophenolResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Jan 24, 2022
TTHMResolvedOct 31, 2021 to Aug 31, 2022
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedOct 31, 2021 to Aug 31, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Jul 27, 2021
EndrinResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
ToxapheneResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
PicloramResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
DinosebResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
CarbofuranResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
HeptachlorResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
LASSOResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
2,4-DResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
PentachlorophenolResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
SimazineResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
MethoxychlorResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
OXAMYLResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
2,4,5-TPResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
ChlordaneResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
DalaponResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
AtrazineResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021

North Baker Water And Or Sewer Dist

MT0004404 · Groundwater · 112 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for North Baker Water And Or Sewer Dist
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedSep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022

Fallon County Water District

MT0003035 · Groundwater · 85 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
0.024 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

160% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Fallon County Water District
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedSep 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2007

Hardness estimate unavailable

No responsible local estimate yet

We did not find enough qualifying recent USGS hardness observations within 25 miles of this ZIP centroid. We leave the value blank instead of substituting a state average. Ask the serving utility or test the household tap for a property-specific result.

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Ask the utility for hardness or test at the tap. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and targeted analysis.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Baker

Is tap water safe in Baker?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.