Skip to content

City water profile

Water hardness in Billings

Find official utility reports, understand hardness, and check the water system serving your home in Billings, Montana.

Utility-reported hardness

Not yet available

Check your provider and source →
State comparison
Unavailable
Evidence comparison rank
—
Matched utilities
10
Active health records
0

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Billings City Of

MT0000153 · Surface water · 114,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.005 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

33% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Billings Heights Co Water Dist Of

MT0000155 · Surface water · 12,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.005 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

33% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (4)
Imported violation history for Billings Heights Co Water Dist Of
RuleStatusPeriod
TTHMArchivedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ArchivedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2025 to Jul 18, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Jul 25, 2025

Lockwood Water And Sewer District

MT0000156 · Surface water · 5,900 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Pioneer Water Service

MT0004226 · Surface water · 900 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.002 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2019 to Dec 31, 2021

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for Pioneer Water Service
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Sep 23, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jan 7, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Jun 22, 2022

Estates At Yellowstone Llc

MT0000464 · Groundwater · 800 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.47 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

113% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2009 to Jun 30, 2009

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for Estates At Yellowstone Llc
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Jul 5, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Dec 13, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Jul 30, 2021

Golden Meadows Subdivision

MT0005141 · Surface water · 772 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.004 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

27% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Golden Meadows Subdivision
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJul 1, 2025 to Dec 22, 2025

Fisher Water Service

MT0001848 · Surface water · 750 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for Fisher Water Service
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2024 to Apr 29, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Jun 22, 2022

Hillside Village

MT0003808 · Surface water · 650 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (5)
Imported violation history for Hillside Village
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Oct 6, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2025 to Jul 17, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2024 to Dec 10, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 2, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Feb 8, 2024

Cherry Creek Estates Llc

MT0004392 · Surface water · 600 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.002 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (8)
Imported violation history for Cherry Creek Estates Llc
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TTHMResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Jul 5, 2023

Windsor Estates

MT0003807 · Surface water · 530 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Windsor Estates
RuleStatusPeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Lead and Copper RuleUnaddressedJan 1, 1996

City summary

What the indexed records say

Billings has 3 published ZIP profiles across Yellowstone County. No qualifying nearby hardness observation is available for the city.

The —–— PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.

Hardness distribution

How local ZIP estimates compare

Soft0 ZIPs
Moderately hard0 ZIPs
Hard0 ZIPs
Very hard0 ZIPs

0 of 3 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.

Evidence quality

Distance, dates, and confidence

Median nearest distance
— miles
Profiles with evidence
0/3

Confidence labels

High: 0Moderate: 0Low: 0

Observation window: unavailable to unavailable.

ZIP directory

Water reports in Billings

Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.

Practical next steps

Move from index to evidence

  1. 1. Open your ZIP. Check distance, dates, confidence, and the associated utility.
  2. 2. Read the current CCR. Confirm source water, detections, limits, ranges, and notices.
  3. 3. Use a measured hardness result. Confirm health concerns or treatment sizing with the right method.

Questions people ask

About water in Billings

Is the water hard?

Check the utility-reported result above when available. Nearby environmental samples cannot establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Is the tap water safe?

Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.

Do I need treatment?

Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.