Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Clancy, MT 59634
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Jefferson County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Saddle Mountain Corp Clancy
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Jefferson County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
9 systems
Serves 350 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Saddle Mountain Corp Clancy
MT0000057 · Groundwater · 350 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.006 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
40% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2015 to Dec 31, 2017
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 3.2 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
246% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Forest Park Water Users Association
MT0000591 · Groundwater · 323 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.015 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
100% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.89 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
145% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 29, 2025 |
Blue Sky Heights Wua Clancy
MT0000030 · Groundwater · 250 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2017 to Jun 30, 2017
Violation history (10)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2025 to Nov 30, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 6, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 17, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2025 to Apr 30, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Aug 15, 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Jul 31, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Mar 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
Hangmans Tree Wua
MT0000128 · Groundwater · 158 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.005 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
33% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Jul 27, 2021 |
Stoney Brook Village Condominium Assoc
MT0004257 · Groundwater · 142 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.004 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
27% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 24, 2025 |
Elkhorn Health And Rehabilitation Llc
MT0000618 · Groundwater · 89 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2019
Violation history (9)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to May 6, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Apr 15, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Jan 6, 2026 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Jul 13, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Jul 20, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Jul 30, 2021 |
Jefferson Tracts Assoc Inc
MT0003614 · Groundwater · 80 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.007 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
47% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 24, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Oct 1, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Jul 21, 2022 |
Red Cliff Estates Hoa
MT0004268 · Groundwater · 48 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.004 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
27% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Dec 30, 2024 to Feb 4, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Jul 21, 2022 |
Rocky Mountain Wua
MT0000058 · Groundwater · 30 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.002 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2019
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025 |
| E. COLI | Resolved | Apr 2, 2021 to Sep 25, 2023 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
37.7
PPM as CaCO₃
Soft
PPM
37.7
GPG
2.2
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
37.7 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
37.7
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
2.2
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
9
Nearest site
12.2 mi
Observation range
Jun 12, 2017–Sep 14, 2017
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: LAD1 Unnamed stream draining Luttrell repository (Spring).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 59634 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Clancy median
38 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 37.7–37.7 PPM
Montana median
94 PPM
56 PPM lower22 indexed ZIP readings · Range 26.3–629 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Clancy
Is tap water safe in Clancy?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.