Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Great Falls, MT 59405

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Cascade County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Great Falls City Of
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Cascade County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

10 systems

Serves 60,000 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Great Falls City Of

MT0000525 · Surface water · 60,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.012 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

80% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Malmstrom Air Force Base

MT0000515 · Surface water · 8,850 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
2.21 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

170% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2016 to Dec 31, 2018

Violation history (5)
Imported violation history for Malmstrom Air Force Base
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedNov 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2024
TTHMResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Jul 26, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jan 5, 2022

Sun Prairie Village County

MT0000521 · Groundwater · 1,800 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Sun Prairie Village County
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Oct 19, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Oct 19, 2023

Prairie Water Company

MT0003539 · Surface water · 1,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (7)
Imported violation history for Prairie Water Company
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2024 to Jul 1, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2024
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Jul 1, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedSep 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedJul 1, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2021 to Jul 1, 2025

Countryside Village Mhp Grt Fls

MT0004830 · Surface water · 600 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (0)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

No comparable numerical result available

Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Gore Hill County Water Dist

MT0000232 · Groundwater · 500 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.004 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

27% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
2.12 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

163% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1995 to Dec 31, 1995

Violation history (50)
Imported violation history for Gore Hill County Water Dist
RuleStatusPeriod
E. COLIResolvedJul 22, 2025 to Jul 24, 2025
EndrinResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
ToxapheneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
OXAMYLResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
DinosebResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
CarbofuranResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
AtrazineResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
LASSOResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
2,4,5-TPResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
PentachlorophenolResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
ChlordaneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
EndrinResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
ToxapheneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
DalaponResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
OXAMYLResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
DinosebResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
2,4-DResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
PentachlorophenolResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
ChlordaneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
CarbofuranResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
MethoxychlorResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
SimazineResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
PicloramResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
2,4-DResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
LASSOResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
DalaponResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
PicloramResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
MethoxychlorResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
SimazineResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
AtrazineResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
2,4,5-TPResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HeptachlorResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
HeptachlorResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)ResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Dec 3, 2024

Bushard Water Company

MT0005164 · Surface water · 425 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025

Violation history (5)
Imported violation history for Bushard Water Company
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedDec 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Groundwater RuleHealth-basedResolvedOct 18, 2024 to Nov 8, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedOct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Jul 31, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024

Highwood Mobile Home Park

MT0004681 · Surface water · 400 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2011 to Jun 30, 2011

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Highwood Mobile Home Park
RuleStatusPeriod
Surface Water Treatment RuleResolvedDec 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Sun Prairie Water District

MT0000571 · Groundwater · 350 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2015 to Dec 31, 2017

Violation history (49)
Imported violation history for Sun Prairie Water District
RuleStatusPeriod
Nitrate-NitriteResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2023 to Nov 1, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Oct 19, 2023
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
ToxapheneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
DalaponResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
OXAMYLResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
PicloramResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
CarbofuranResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
AtrazineResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
LASSOResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
PentachlorophenolResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
ChlordaneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Vinyl chlorideResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
TrichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
EthylbenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
StyreneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
EndrinResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
HeptachlorResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
DinosebResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
BenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
TolueneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
SimazineResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
2,4-DResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
2,4,5-TPResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
MethoxychlorResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Xylenes, TotalResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedDec 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Oct 28, 2021

Great Falls Rv Park

MT0000027 · Surface water · 274 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (0)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

No comparable numerical result available

Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Hardness estimate unavailable

No responsible local estimate yet

We did not find enough qualifying recent USGS hardness observations within 25 miles of this ZIP centroid. We leave the value blank instead of substituting a state average. Ask the serving utility or test the household tap for a property-specific result.

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Ask the utility for hardness or test at the tap. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and targeted analysis.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Great Falls

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Great Falls reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Great Falls

Is tap water safe in Great Falls?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.