Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Whitefish, MT 59937

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Flathead County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Whitefish City Of
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Flathead County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

10 systems

Serves 10,418 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Whitefish City Of

MT0000357 · Surface water · 10,418 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.002 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Big Mountain Water Company

MT0000060 · Groundwater · 2,435 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.007 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

47% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (23)
Imported violation history for Big Mountain Water Company
RuleStatusPeriod
BHC-GAMMAResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
DalaponResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
OXAMYLResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
AtrazineResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
HeptachlorResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
ChlordaneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
SimazineResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
2,4,5-TPResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
EndrinResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
MethoxychlorResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
ToxapheneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
LASSOResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
PicloramResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
CarbofuranResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
DinosebResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
HEXACHLOROBENZENEResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
PentachlorophenolResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
2,4-DResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024

Ptarmigan Village Inc

MT0000133 · Groundwater · 600 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2015 to Dec 31, 2017

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Ptarmigan Village Inc
RuleStatusPeriod
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025

Flathead Co Water District No 8

MT0000261 · Groundwater · 475 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Forest Acres Tr Pk Whitefish

MT0000064 · Groundwater · 390 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Forest Acres Tr Pk Whitefish
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Jul 5, 2023
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Aug 6, 2021

Iron Horse Homeowners Assoc

MT0004052 · Groundwater · 335 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Country Lake Homes Whitefish

MT0003031 · Groundwater · 260 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2019

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Country Lake Homes Whitefish
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2022 to Jun 25, 2023

Happy Valley Water Dist B Kspl

MT0001984 · Groundwater · 207 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.002 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Northwoods Water System Coop Inc

MT0001736 · Groundwater · 135 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.003 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

20% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Alpine Village Wua

MT0003229 · Groundwater · 125 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
0.066 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

440% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Alpine Village Wua
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedDec 30, 2024 to Feb 4, 2025

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Moderately Hard

PPM

73.7

GPG

4.3

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

73.7 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

73.7

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

4.3

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

1

Nearest site

21.9 mi

Observation range

Sep 10, 2018–Sep 10, 2018

Regional evidence confidence

Low

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: S F Flathead River nr Columbia Falls MT (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 59937 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Whitefish median

74 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 73.7–73.7 PPM

Montana median

94 PPM

20 PPM lower

22 indexed ZIP readings · Range 26.3–629 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Whitefish

Is tap water safe in Whitefish?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.