Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Cary, NC 27518

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Wake County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Cary, Town Of
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Wake County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

10 systems

Serves 227,300 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Cary, Town Of

NC0392020 · Surface water · 227,300 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Cary, Town Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Public NoticeResolvedMay 10, 2023 to Feb 13, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-basedResolvedMay 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023

Medfield Estates S/d

NC0392160 · Groundwater · 772 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0072 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

48% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
3.95 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

304% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2010

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Medfield Estates S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Jan 30, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedDec 11, 2023 to Dec 11, 2023

Mobile Estates

NC4392162 · Surface water · 690 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Mobile Estates
RuleStatusPeriod
TTHMResolvedMar 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedMar 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021

Swift Creek Master System

NC0392361 · Groundwater · 465 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Swift Creek Master System
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 10, 2024

Sedgemoor S/d

NC4392102 · Groundwater · 435 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0016 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

11% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Sedgemoor S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 12, 2024

Chatham Estates Mhp

NC4092069 · Surface water · 366 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Wedgewood Square S/d

NC0392381 · Groundwater · 96 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (7)
Imported violation history for Wedgewood Square S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 17, 2024
2,4,5-TPResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
DinosebResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
PentachlorophenolResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
PicloramResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
DalaponResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
2,4-DResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Greythorne S/d

NC4092021 · Groundwater · 94 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Greythorne S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJan 11, 2024 to Feb 2, 2024

Olde South Trace Sd

NC4392131 · Groundwater · 76 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Olde South Trace Sd
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJan 11, 2024 to Feb 2, 2024

Harmony Glen S/d

NC4392229 · Groundwater · 74 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Harmony Glen S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Soft

PPM

46.6

GPG

2.7

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

46.6 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

46.6

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

2.7

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

44

Nearest site

1.4 mi

Observation range

Jul 12, 2016–Jun 9, 2026

Regional evidence confidence

High

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: SWIFT CREEK NEAR APEX, NC (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 27518 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Cary median

43 PPM

About the same

4 indexed ZIP readings · Range 41.9–46.6 PPM

North Carolina median

45 PPM

About the same

247 indexed ZIP readings · Range 3.1–269 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Cary

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Cary reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Cary

Is tap water safe in Cary?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.