Skip to content

City water profile

Water hardness in Chapel Hill

Find official utility reports, understand hardness, and check the water system serving your home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Utility-reported hardness

Not yet available

Check your provider and source →
State comparison
Unavailable
Evidence comparison rank
—
Matched utilities
10
Active health records
0

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Stoneridge Master

NC0368185 · Groundwater · 681 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.595 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

123% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (5)
Imported violation history for Stoneridge Master
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Feb 6, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2023 to May 21, 2024

Beechwood Cove/polks Landing

NC0319110 · Surface water · 406 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.6 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

123% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 1994 to Jun 30, 1994

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Colvard Farms S/d

NC4019004 · Groundwater · 365 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0019 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Colvard Farms S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026

Chatham S/d

NC0319104 · Surface water · 365 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
2.02 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

155% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Ridgewood Mhp

NC0368130 · Groundwater · 330 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (62)
Imported violation history for Ridgewood Mhp
RuleStatusPeriod
Public NoticeAddressedFeb 15, 2026
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedFeb 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026
Consumer Confidence RuleAddressedJul 1, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-basedResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Jun 2, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolvedOct 17, 2024 to Jun 2, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Nov 17, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeAddressedFeb 23, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeAddressedFeb 23, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeAddressedFeb 23, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 23, 2024 to Jan 24, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Vinyl chlorideResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TolueneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
EthylbenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
StyreneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Xylenes, TotalResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
BenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
TrichloroethyleneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Dec 29, 2023
NitrateResolvedJul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedOct 29, 2022 to Jan 27, 2023
NitrateResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Aug 26, 2021
NitrateResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Public NoticeResolvedMay 30, 2021 to Nov 23, 2021
Public NoticeResolvedMay 30, 2021 to Nov 23, 2021
NitrateResolvedApr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021

Robin`s Wood

NC0368145 · Groundwater · 246 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.4 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

108% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Robin`s Wood
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024

Northwood S/d

NC0368179 · Groundwater · 208 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
3.69 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

284% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2011

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

The Trails S/d

NC0368182 · Groundwater · 200 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for The Trails S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMay 11, 2025 to Jun 13, 2025
Public NoticeResolvedAug 15, 2021 to Jan 25, 2022
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021

Bingham Woods Mhp

NC0368188 · Groundwater · 190 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Bingham Woods Mhp
RuleStatusPeriod
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 17, 2022
Public NoticeResolvedJun 18, 2021 to Jul 9, 2021

Woodbridge S/d

NC0319135 · Groundwater · 143 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.5 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

115% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2017 to Jun 30, 2017

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Woodbridge S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024

City summary

What the indexed records say

Chapel Hill has 4 published ZIP profiles across Orange County and Chatham County. The regional-evidence median is 48 PPM. The city does not meet the stricter comparison standard.

The 46.1–136 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label. At least one estimate is marked low confidence, so observation distance and date deserve extra attention.

Hardness distribution

How local ZIP estimates compare

Soft3 ZIPs
Moderately hard0 ZIPs
Hard1 ZIP
Very hard0 ZIPs

4 of 4 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.

Evidence quality

Distance, dates, and confidence

Median nearest distance
11.7 miles
Profiles with evidence
4/4

Confidence labels

High: 0Moderate: 0Low: 4

Observation window: Mar 29, 2018 to Dec 18, 2019.

ZIP directory

Water reports in Chapel Hill

Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.

Practical next steps

Move from index to evidence

  1. 1. Open your ZIP. Check distance, dates, confidence, and the associated utility.
  2. 2. Read the current CCR. Confirm source water, detections, limits, ranges, and notices.
  3. 3. Use a measured hardness result. Confirm health concerns or treatment sizing with the right method.

Questions people ask

About water in Chapel Hill

Is the water hard?

Check the utility-reported result above when available. Nearby environmental samples cannot establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Is the tap water safe?

Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.

Do I need treatment?

Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.