City water profile

Water hardness in Dallas

Find official utility reports, understand hardness, and check the water system serving your home in Dallas, North Carolina.

Utility-reported hardness

Not yet available

Check your provider and source →

State comparison: Unavailable
Evidence comparison rank: —
Matched utilities: 10
Active health records: 1

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

Convert a hardness result →Test your tap →

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Dallas, Town Of

NC0136065 · Surface water · 8,212 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

TTHM

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation

Reported level: 0.094 MG/L
Maximum contaminant level: 0.08 MG/L

118% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023

Violation history (14)

Imported violation history for Dallas, Town Of
Rule	Status	Period
Public Notice	Addressed	Jan 29, 2026
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Sep 11, 2024 to Sep 13, 2024
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Nov 18, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	Resolved	Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
TTHM	Resolved	Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
CARBON, TOTAL	Resolved	Jul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
TTHMHealth-based	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Lead and Copper Rule	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 7, 2023
Public Notice	Resolved	Nov 8, 2022 to Jan 9, 2023
TTHMHealth-based	Resolved	Oct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
TTHMHealth-based	Resolved	Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Public Notice	Resolved	May 25, 2022 to Jul 26, 2022
Public Notice	Resolved	Sep 22, 2021 to Dec 20, 2021
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	May 11, 2021 to May 27, 2021

College Park Sd

NC0136214 · Groundwater · 208 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level

Reported level: 2.37 mg/L
Action level: 1.3 mg/L

182% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Windsor Heights Mhp

NC0136346 · Groundwater · 178 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.006 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

40% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (4)

Imported violation history for Windsor Heights Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Nov 14, 2024
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021
Lead and Copper Rule	Resolved	Jan 1, 2021 to Apr 12, 2021
Public Notice	Addressed	Aug 21, 2020

Cedarwood Acres

NC0136114 · Groundwater · 162 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Cedarwood Acres
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 4, 2024

Donna-Lynn Mhp

NC0136124 · Groundwater · 149 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (8)

Imported violation history for Donna-Lynn Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based	Resolved	Oct 17, 2024 to Apr 22, 2025
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS	Resolved	Oct 17, 2024 to Apr 22, 2025
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Nov 14, 2024
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2022 to Nov 8, 2022
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2022
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 1, 2021
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2019

Hoyle`s Creek Mhp

NC0136163 · Groundwater · 147 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Hoyle`s Creek Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 17, 2024

Mcconnell S/d

NC0136293 · Groundwater · 124 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level

Reported level: 8.295 mg/L
Action level: 1.3 mg/L

638% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Mcconnell S/d
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 6, 2024

Gallagher Trails S/d

NC0136244 · Groundwater · 109 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.0036 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

24% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level

Reported level: 1.912 mg/L
Action level: 1.3 mg/L

147% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Gallagher Trails S/d
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024

Wimbledon S/d

NC0136313 · Groundwater · 107 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Wimbledon S/d
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 6, 2024

Forest Hill Mhp

NC0136359 · Groundwater · 89 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.005 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

33% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (6)

Imported violation history for Forest Hill Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS	Unaddressed	Oct 17, 2024
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based	Unaddressed	Oct 17, 2024
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021
Consumer Confidence Rule	Addressed	Jul 1, 2019
Consumer Confidence Rule	Addressed	Jul 1, 2016
Lead and Copper Rule	Unaddressed	Jul 1, 1993

City summary

What the indexed records say

Dallas has 1 published ZIP profile across Gaston County. No qualifying nearby hardness observation is available for the city.

Because only one ZIP is represented, the city median and range are the same local estimate. It should not be read as multiple independent samples across the community.

Hardness distribution

How local ZIP estimates compare

Soft0 ZIPs

Moderately hard0 ZIPs

Hard0 ZIPs

Very hard0 ZIPs

0 of 1 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.

Evidence quality

Distance, dates, and confidence

Median nearest distance: — miles
Profiles with evidence: 0/1

Confidence labels

High: 0Moderate: 0Low: 0

Observation window: unavailable to unavailable.

ZIP directory

Water reports in Dallas

Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.

ZIP code

28034

No estimate

—

Nearest site: — mi
Confidence: —

View full ZIP evidence →

Practical next steps

Move from index to evidence

1. Open your ZIP. Check distance, dates, confidence, and the associated utility.
2. Read the current CCR. Confirm source water, detections, limits, ranges, and notices.
3. Use a measured hardness result. Confirm health concerns or treatment sizing with the right method.

Continue comparing

Other North Carolina communities

Belmont

Gaston County

38 PPM median

Gastonia

Gaston County

38 PPM median

Lowell

Gaston County

38 PPM median

Mcadenville

Gaston County

38 PPM median

Alexis

Gaston County

— No median

Cherryville

Gaston County

— No median

Search all 381 North Carolina cities →

Questions people ask

About water in Dallas

Is the water hard?

Check the utility-reported result above when available. Nearby environmental samples cannot establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Is the tap water safe?

Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.

Do I need treatment?

Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.