Skip to content

City water profile

Water hardness in Fuquay-Varina

Find official utility reports, understand hardness, and check the water system serving your home in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina.

Utility-reported hardness

Not yet available

Check your provider and source →
State comparison
Unavailable
Evidence comparison rank
—
Matched utilities
10
Active health records
0

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Fuquay-Varina, Town Of

NC0392055 · Surface water · 42,954 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (6)
Imported violation history for Fuquay-Varina, Town Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)AddressedApr 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026
TTHMAddressedApr 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
TTHMResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedApr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024

High Grove S/d

NC4092096 · Groundwater · 373 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0017 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

11% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Amherst S/d

NC0392095 · Groundwater · 325 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Crooked Creek S/d

NC4392172 · Groundwater · 274 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Crooked Creek S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 13, 2024

Sun Ridge Farm S/d

NC4392156 · Surface water · 272 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0025 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

17% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Forest Glen Master

NC4392142 · Groundwater · 270 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Hampton Park Sd

NC4092084 · Groundwater · 206 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0075 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

50% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (22)
Imported violation history for Hampton Park Sd
RuleStatusPeriod
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Vinyl chlorideResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
BenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
EthylbenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
StyreneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Xylenes, TotalResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TrichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TolueneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 12, 2024

Pear Meadows S/d

NC0392093 · Surface water · 178 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Pear Meadows S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 9, 2024

Country Creek S/d

NC0392092 · Groundwater · 176 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (4)
Imported violation history for Country Creek S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Public NoticeAddressedOct 23, 2025
TTHMResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Sep 27, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Sep 27, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2021 to Apr 28, 2021

Stonewood Manor S/d

NC4092178 · Groundwater · 127 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

City summary

What the indexed records say

Fuquay-Varina has 2 published ZIP profiles across Harnett County and Wake County. The regional-evidence median is 34 PPM. The city does not meet the stricter comparison standard.

The 29.5–38.5 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.

Hardness distribution

How local ZIP estimates compare

Soft2 ZIPs
Moderately hard0 ZIPs
Hard0 ZIPs
Very hard0 ZIPs

2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.

Evidence quality

Distance, dates, and confidence

Median nearest distance
12.9 miles
Profiles with evidence
2/2

Confidence labels

High: 0Moderate: 2Low: 0

Observation window: Jul 15, 2019 to Jun 1, 2026.

ZIP directory

Water reports in Fuquay-Varina

Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.

Practical next steps

Move from index to evidence

  1. 1. Open your ZIP. Check distance, dates, confidence, and the associated utility.
  2. 2. Read the current CCR. Confirm source water, detections, limits, ranges, and notices.
  3. 3. Use a measured hardness result. Confirm health concerns or treatment sizing with the right method.

Questions people ask

About water in Fuquay-Varina

Is the water hard?

Check the utility-reported result above when available. Nearby environmental samples cannot establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Is the tap water safe?

Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.

Do I need treatment?

Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.