City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Goldsboro, North Carolina.
Median indexed hardness
124PPM
4 indexed ZIPs
Range 102.7–147 PPM
City summary
Goldsboro has 4 published ZIP profiles across Wayne County. The indexed median is 124 PPM, compared with 41 PPM across North Carolina.
Among the 381 North Carolinacities with an indexed median, Goldsboro ranks #98from highest to lowest. Across all 519 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 4.7to 267.5 PPM.
The 102.7–147 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
4 of 4 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Aug 2, 2016 to Sep 11, 2024.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
ZIP code
102.7 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
147 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
106 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
142 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
Public water systems
PWSID NC0496065
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0496010
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC6096001
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0496060
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0496045
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC6096002
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0496155
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | NC6096002 | Apr 1, 2026 | Addressed |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NC0496155 | Aug 11, 2025 | Resolved |
| Lead and Copper Rule | NC0496045 | Jan 1, 2025 | Addressed |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | NC0496065 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | NC0496065 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved · health-based |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | NC6096001 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved · health-based |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | NC6096001 | Oct 17, 2024 | Resolved |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | NC0496045 | Jan 1, 2024 | Resolved |
| TTHM | NC0496045 | Jan 1, 2024 | Resolved |
| Public Notice | NC6096001 | Jul 10, 2023 | Resolved |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 124 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.