Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Middlesex, NC 27557
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Nash County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Middlesex Water System
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Nash County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
5 systems
Serves 1,389 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Middlesex Water System
NC0464050 · Groundwater · 1,389 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (3)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.46 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
112% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2008 to Jun 30, 2008
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 7.0e-5 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 5.0e-5 MG/L
140% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023
Violation history (15)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Addressed | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Chlordane | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Heptachlor epoxide | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 26, 2023 to Nov 1, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 23, 2023 to Oct 19, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Nov 15, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 19, 2023 to Aug 25, 2023 |
| ETHYLENE DIBROMIDEHealth-based | Archived | Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 8, 2023 |
| ETHYLENE DIBROMIDEHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Aug 1, 2021 to Jul 31, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Aug 1, 2021 to Jul 31, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jan 17, 2021 to Jul 2, 2021 |
Cedar Lake Mhp
NC0464317 · Groundwater · 124 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.004 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
27% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025 |
Adams Mhp
NC0351120 · Groundwater · 80 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.4 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
108% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2000 to Dec 31, 2000
Violation history (6)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 11, 2024 to Jan 3, 2025 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Sep 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Addressed | Feb 2, 2014 |
| Public Notice | Addressed | Feb 2, 2014 |
| Public Notice | Addressed | Jul 9, 2011 |
Gibson Glen S/d
NC4051010 · Groundwater · 60 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 11, 2024 |
Neighbor`s Walk S/d
NC4051014 · Groundwater · 60 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
55.1
PPM as CaCO₃
Soft
PPM
55.1
GPG
3.2
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
55.1 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
55.1
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
3.2
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
8
Nearest site
11.1 mi
Observation range
Dec 5, 2019–Oct 24, 2023
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: WK-429 WENDELL MS NEAR WENDELL, NC BEDROCK (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 27557 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Middlesex median
55 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 55.1–55.1 PPM
North Carolina median
45 PPM
10 PPM higher247 indexed ZIP readings · Range 3.1–269 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Middlesex
Is tap water safe in Middlesex?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.