Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Bartlett, NH 03812
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Carroll County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Lower Bartlett Water Pct
- Source water
- Groundwater + Surface water
- County
- Carroll County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
10 systems
Serves 3,850 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Lower Bartlett Water Pct
NH0161020 · Groundwater · 3,850 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.001 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
7% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 3.46 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
266% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
River Run Condos
NH0162170 · Groundwater · 750 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.02 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
133% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2015 to Dec 31, 2017
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 2.1 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
162% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2008 to Jun 30, 2008
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Beryllium, Total | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 |
| Beryllium, Total | Resolved | Apr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 13, 2021 |
Bartlett Village Pct
NH0161010 · Surface water · 625 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.061 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.06 MG/L
102% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Violation history (7)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Jun 2, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-based | Resolved | Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Feb 28, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-based | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Jan 1, 2024 to Jan 22, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-based | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-based | Resolved | Jul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023 |
Nordic Village
NH0162270 · Groundwater · 315 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 10, 2024 |
Linderhof Prop Ownr Assn
NH0162070 · Groundwater · 295 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Eagle Ridge Resort
NH0162400 · Groundwater · 270 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.029 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
193% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1993 to Dec 31, 1993
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 4.25 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
327% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1996 to Dec 31, 1996
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Goodrich Property
NH0162350 · Groundwater · 175 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Beryllium, Total
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.005 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.004 MG/L
125% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Beryllium, TotalHealth-based | Archived | Apr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025 |
| Beryllium, TotalHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
Mountainside On Attitash
NH0162210 · Groundwater · 167 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Resolved | Feb 27, 2024 to May 21, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Sep 16, 2023 to Jun 27, 2024 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2022 to Apr 25, 2022 |
Top Notch Condos
NH0162200 · Groundwater · 163 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.022 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
147% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2018 to Jun 30, 2018
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Cow Hill Wellhouse
NH0162160 · Groundwater · 150 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
23.3
PPM as CaCO₃
Soft
PPM
23.3
GPG
1.4
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
23.3 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
23.3
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
1.4
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
2
Nearest site
8 mi
Observation range
Jun 13, 2017–Sep 11, 2019
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: NH-CWW 9 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 03812 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Bartlett median
23 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 23.3–23.3 PPM
New Hampshire median
43 PPM
20 PPM lower75 indexed ZIP readings · Range 3.2–150 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Bartlett
Is tap water safe in Bartlett?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.