Hardness
Moderately Hard
61.6 PPM · 3.6 GPG
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Exeter, NH 03833
A source-transparent look at local hardness, associated public water systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Rockingham County.
2 reported benchmark flags
- Primary matched system
- Exeter Water Dept
- Source water
- Surface water + Groundwater
- County
- Rockingham County
- Profile updated
At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
Compliance screen
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Lead 90th percentile
0 mg/L
0% of action level
Utility match
8 systems
Serves 12,236 people system-wide
Hardness meter
How hard is the water?
Estimated local hardness
USGS hardness classification scale
61.6 PPM
Soft
0–59Moderate
60–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–59Moderate
60–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
61.6
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
3.6
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
What this means at home
At 61.6 PPM, mineral scale can build up on fixtures and heating elements, reduce soap lather, and leave visible spotting. Hardness is primarily an aesthetic and appliance concern—not itself a tap-water safety rating.
USGS sites used
72
Nearest site
8.9 mi
Observation range
Jan 4, 2016–Jun 8, 2026
Estimate confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest qualifying hardness observation at each nearby monitoring site. Nearest monitoring location: POWWOW RIVER AT MAIN ST AT AMESBURY, MA (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗
Regional context
Is 03833 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Exeter median
62 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 61.6–61.6 PPM
New Hampshire median
58 PPM
About the same90 indexed ZIP readings · Range 16–102 PPM
EPA benchmark screen
Contaminant snapshot
Available numerical results from associated SDWIS community water systems, compared with the applicable action level or federal MCL. Federal measured-value coverage is incomplete.
1 pass2 fail
Lead (PB90)
0 mg/L
Reported Dec 31, 2024
Copper (CU90)
2.02 mg/L
Reported Dec 31, 2024
Numerical coverage
3 comparable results
Missing values remain blank; absence is not treated as a pass.
Lead (90th percentile)
Measured in mg/L
Local 0
EPA limit 0.015
Copper (90th percentile)
Measured in mg/L
Local 2.02
EPA limit 1.3
TTHM
Measured in MG/L
Local 0.082
EPA limit 0.08
Share of EPA benchmark
100% line = listed limit
2026Q2
- All records
- 8
- Health-based
- 2
- Active health-based
- 0
| Contaminant or rule | System | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NH0802010 | Unaddressed | Mar 11, 2026 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NH0802010 | Archived | Jan 1, 2026through Feb 1, 2026 |
| TTHMHealth-basedReported 0.082 MG/L · MCL 0.08 | NH0801010 | Archived | Oct 1, 2025through Dec 31, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper RuleHealth-based | NH0802010 | Resolved | May 30, 2025through Aug 21, 2025 |
| Nitrate | NH0802020 | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022through Dec 31, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NH0802010 | Resolved | Mar 1, 2021through Apr 1, 2021 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NH0802010 | Resolved | Mar 1, 2021through May 3, 2021 |
| Public Notice | NH0801010 | Unaddressed | Jan 4, 2015 |
No reported violation does not prove that every contaminant was tested or absent; SDWIS measured values are incomplete and lag state records.
Solutions matcher
Your personalized water action plan
Matched to Exeter ZIP 03833 using 61.6 PPM nearby hardness and 3 reported measurement benchmarks.
Drinking water protection
Under-Sink Reverse Osmosis System
Copper (90th percentile), TTHM have a measured benchmark flag or active health-based SDWIS record in this profile.
A certified multi-stage RO system targets a broader range of dissolved contaminants at the kitchen tap.
Explore under-sink filtrationAffiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases, at no added cost to you. Product matching is educational and does not replace certified water testing.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Exeter
Is tap water safe in Exeter?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Nearby USGS observations produce an estimate of 61.6 PPM, or 3.6 grains per gallon, classified as moderately hard. This is not a household tap measurement.
Do I need a water softener?+
There is no high-hardness trigger in this profile. Confirm with a tap test before buying equipment.