Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Wolfeboro, NH 03894
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Carroll County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Wolfeboro Water And Sewer
- Source water
- Surface water + Groundwater
- County
- Carroll County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
5 systems
Serves 6,000 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Wolfeboro Water And Sewer
NH2561010 · Surface water · 6,000 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.002 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2022
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Birches Of Wolfeboro Coop
NH2563010 · Groundwater · 159 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.018 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
120% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2001 to Dec 31, 2003
Arsenic
EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation
- Reported level
- 0.014 MG/L
- Maximum contaminant level
- 0.01 MG/L
140% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| ArsenicHealth-based | Archived | Jan 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026 |
| ArsenicHealth-based | Archived | Oct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
Point Breeze Condos
NH2562030 · Groundwater · 113 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.02 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
133% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2019 to Dec 31, 2021
Violation history (22)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2023 to Apr 3, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 19, 2008 |
Sherwood Forest
NH2562050 · Groundwater · 55 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Aug 13, 2025 to Aug 26, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Aug 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2025 to Apr 7, 2025 |
Wentworth Estates
NH2562010 · Groundwater · 50 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (0)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
No comparable numerical result available
Federal SDWIS data does not provide a usable numerical result and benchmark for this profile. Missing data is not a pass. Check the serving utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 11, 2021 |
Hardness estimate unavailable
No responsible local estimate yet
We did not find enough qualifying recent USGS hardness observations within 25 miles of this ZIP centroid. We leave the value blank instead of substituting a state average. Ask the serving utility or test the household tap for a property-specific result.
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Ask the utility for hardness or test at the tap. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and targeted analysis.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Wolfeboro
Is tap water safe in Wolfeboro?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.