Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Angel Fire, NM 87710
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Colfax County.
6 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
- Largest possible serving system
- Village Of Angel Fire
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Colfax County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
Review needed
6 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
3 systems
Serves 6,045 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Village Of Angel Fire
NM3531904 · Groundwater · 6,045 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
4 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0059 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
39% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (55)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 30, 2025 to Dec 23, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Sep 24, 2025 to Oct 30, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Sep 24, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Feb 25, 2026 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Feb 25, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 19, 2024 to Jun 27, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Apr 24, 2024 to Jun 27, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 26, 2023 to Aug 19, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 26, 2023 to Aug 19, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 26, 2023 to Aug 19, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Aug 1, 2023 to Aug 11, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Mar 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 25, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 8, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
Val Verde 5 Property Owners Association
NM3500904 · Groundwater · 100 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 9.0e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
6% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Jun 13, 2022 |
Angel Nest Apartments
NM3526804 · Groundwater · 45 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
2 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (16)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Nov 3, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 21, 2025 to Apr 10, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 21, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Feb 21, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 21, 2025 to Feb 24, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 21, 2025 to Aug 28, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Feb 21, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Jan 9, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jun 6, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Mar 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2023 to Apr 30, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Nov 3, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Nov 14, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | May 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Jul 27, 2021 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
139.5
PPM as CaCO₃
Hard
PPM
139.5
GPG
8.2
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
139.5 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
139.5
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
8.2
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
6
Nearest site
16.4 mi
Observation range
Aug 10, 2021–Apr 22, 2026
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 22N.16E.09.444 1 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 87710 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Angel Fire median
140 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 139.5–139.5 PPM
New Mexico median
206 PPM
66 PPM lower157 indexed ZIP readings · Range 2.1–1435 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Angel Fire
Is tap water safe in Angel Fire?+
EPA ECHO reports 6 active health-based violations among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.