Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Cordova, NM 87523
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Rio Arriba County.
1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
- Largest possible serving system
- Cordova Mdwca
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Rio Arriba County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
1 system
Serves 325 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Cordova Mdwca
NM3501221 · Groundwater · 325 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0037 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
25% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2018 to Dec 31, 2020
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 3.2 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
246% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (38)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorine | Archived | Mar 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Feb 7, 2026 to Mar 21, 2026 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Feb 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026 |
| Chlorine | Archived | Feb 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Dec 12, 2025 to Mar 21, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 28, 2025 to Mar 21, 2026 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Sep 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 26, 2025 to Mar 21, 2026 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Aug 22, 2025 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 31, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 31, 2025 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Nov 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Addressed | Oct 17, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Addressed | Oct 17, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 31, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Apr 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Feb 24, 2024 to Mar 26, 2024 |
| Groundwater Rule | Resolved | Nov 7, 2023 to Nov 15, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jun 16, 2023 to Jul 18, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Feb 16, 2023 to Jun 5, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Jul 18, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Sep 23, 2022 to Jun 5, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Jul 21, 2023 |
| E. COLI | Unaddressed | May 2, 2013 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 10, 2012 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Oct 14, 2012 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Sep 7, 2012 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Dec 9, 2011 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Oct 19, 1999 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
144.5
PPM as CaCO₃
Hard
PPM
144.5
GPG
8.5
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
144.5 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
144.5
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
8.5
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
2
Nearest site
23.8 mi
Observation range
Sep 15, 2020–Sep 15, 2020
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: 17N.09E.27.232 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 87523 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Cordova median
145 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 144.5–144.5 PPM
New Mexico median
206 PPM
61 PPM lower157 indexed ZIP readings · Range 2.1–1435 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Cordova
Is tap water safe in Cordova?+
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.