City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Median indexed hardness
95PPM
3 indexed ZIPs
Range 95–95 PPM
City summary
Santa Fe has 3 published ZIP profiles across Santa Fe County. The indexed median is 95 PPM, compared with 228 PPM across New Mexico.
Among the 160 New Mexicocities with an indexed median, Santa Fe ranks #157from highest to lowest. Across all 195 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 74.2to 688.5 PPM.
The 95–95 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
3 of 3 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 25, 2016 to Apr 2, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID NM3505126
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3537326
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3500826
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3500926
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3500626
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3505226
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3503926
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3593226
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3537526
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NM3510026
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
10 unique active health-based records appear among associated systems. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | NM3505126 | Feb 28, 2026 | Unaddressed |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NM3571426 | Feb 1, 2026 | Resolved |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
| Groundwater Rule | NM3580526 | Jan 22, 2026 | Unaddressed · health-based |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 95 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.