Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in New York, NY 10314

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Richmond County.

1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
Largest possible serving system
New York City System
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Richmond County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection

18–100 ppm

Utility-reported hardness as CaCO₃ · 2025

Reported average: 32 ppm (1.9 GPG).

313 distribution-system samples. This is a system-wide range and average; it is not a measurement from a particular ZIP or building.

Read the utility’s source report ↗

Page 11, drinking water quality testing results, Hardness (mg/L CaCO3). Source checked Sep 29, 2026.

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

18–100 ppm

Confirm your provider above

All possible systems

Review needed

1 active health-based record

Utility match

2 systems

Serves 8,271,000 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

New York City System

NY7003493 · Surface water · 8,271,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system

Read 2025 Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report ↗
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.01 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

67% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for New York City System
RuleStatusPeriod
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleHealth-basedAddressedFeb 1, 2017

Cedar Valley Waterworks

NY1322057 · Groundwater · 300 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0031 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

21% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Moderately Hard

PPM

99.1

GPG

5.8

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

99.1 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

99.1

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

5.8

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

41

Nearest site

6.4 mi

Observation range

Aug 1, 2016–Sep 25, 2023

Regional evidence confidence

Moderate

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: Rahway River at Rahway NJ (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 10314 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

New York median

135 PPM

36 PPM lower

211 indexed ZIP readings · Range 79.6–176 PPM

New York median

147 PPM

48 PPM lower

810 indexed ZIP readings · Range 5.5–1070 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in New York

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all New York reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for New York

Is tap water safe in New York?+

EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.

How hard is the water?+

See the utility-reported ranges above and confirm which provider serves you. Values can vary within a system and over time.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.