Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Columbia, SC 29229

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Richland County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Columbia City Of (sc4010001)
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Richland County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

10 systems

Serves 354,068 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Columbia City Of (sc4010001)

SC4010001 · Surface water · 354,068 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.005 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

33% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Chlorite

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation
Reported level
1.33 MG/L
Maximum contaminant level
1 MG/L

133% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Dec 1, 2024 to Dec 16, 2024

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Columbia City Of (sc4010001)
RuleStatusPeriod
ChloriteHealth-basedResolvedDec 1, 2024 to Dec 16, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-basedResolvedApr 1, 2021 to Apr 30, 2021

Bay Capital Water Works (sc4050031)

SC4050031 · Groundwater · 647 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Bgwc Charleswood S/d (4050008)

SC4050008 · Surface water · 484 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Bgwc Farrowwood Estates (sc4050012)

SC4050012 · Surface water · 356 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (3)
Imported violation history for Bgwc Farrowwood Estates (sc4050012)
RuleStatusPeriod
Surface Water Treatment RuleResolvedJun 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedJun 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
ChlorineResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022

Bgwc Washington Heights (sc4050013)

SC4050013 · Surface water · 190 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.002 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Silver Hill Manuf Home Comm. (sc4060019)

SC4060019 · Groundwater · 180 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.001 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

7% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Silver Hill Manuf Home Comm. (sc4060019)
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Oct 1, 2022

Freeway Mhp (sc4060005)

SC4060005 · Groundwater · 135 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Palmetto Park (4060006)

SC4060006 · Groundwater · 132 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.012 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

80% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
2.52 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

194% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 1995 to Jun 30, 1995

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Lakewood Mhp (sc4060032)

SC4060032 · Groundwater · 110 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
2 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

154% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2003 to Jun 30, 2003

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Sandy Hill Mhp (sc4060064)

SC4060064 · Groundwater · 81 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.007 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

47% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
3.735 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

287% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2001 to Jun 30, 2001

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Hardness estimate unavailable

No responsible local estimate yet

We did not find enough qualifying recent USGS hardness observations within 25 miles of this ZIP centroid. We leave the value blank instead of substituting a state average. Ask the serving utility or test the household tap for a property-specific result.

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Ask the utility for hardness or test at the tap. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and targeted analysis.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Columbia

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Columbia reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Columbia

Is tap water safe in Columbia?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.