Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Gaston, SC 29053
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Lexington County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Gaston Rural Water Dist (sc3220002)
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Lexington County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
9 systems
Serves 7,550 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Gaston Rural Water Dist (sc3220002)
SC3220002 · Groundwater · 7,550 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.005 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
33% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.8 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
138% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 1999 to Dec 31, 2001
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Upper Calhoun/belleville (0920001)
SC0920001 · Groundwater · 1,779 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 9.6e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
6% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Resolved | Nov 23, 2024 to Dec 18, 2024 |
Upper Calhoun/sandy Run (sc0920002)
SC0920002 · Groundwater · 1,247 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0016 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
11% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.88 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
145% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2009 to Dec 31, 2011
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Resolved | Aug 1, 2025 to Aug 12, 2025 |
Ridge Pointe S/d (sc3250105)
SC3250105 · Groundwater · 336 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.006 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
40% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Bgwc Sangaree Mhp (sc3260012)
SC3260012 · Groundwater · 174 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Highlands At Gaston (sc3270011)
SC3270011 · Groundwater · 140 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2024
Violation history (5)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 13, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 13, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Apr 26, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Apr 26, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Sep 24, 2024 |
Halter Acres Mhp (sc3260090)
SC3260090 · Groundwater · 90 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2013 |
Sand Mountain Mhp (sc3260183)
SC3260183 · Groundwater · 40 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.008 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
53% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 3.75 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
288% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 1995 to Jun 30, 1995
Violation history (12)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2026 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Dec 5, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Oct 31, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Jul 31, 2021 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Oct 1, 2010 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Jul 1, 2009 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Jul 1, 2007 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Oct 1, 2005 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Jul 1, 2004 |
Piney Lane Mhp (sc4060052)
SC4060052 · Groundwater · 32 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.01 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
67% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2022
Violation history (7)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Addressed | Feb 1, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Dec 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Nov 1, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
6.1
PPM as CaCO₃
Soft
PPM
6.1
GPG
0.4
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
6.1 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
6.1
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
0.4
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
26
Nearest site
9.7 mi
Observation range
Aug 1, 2016–Sep 1, 2016
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: LEX- 839 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 29053 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Gaston median
6 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 6.1–6.1 PPM
South Carolina median
27 PPM
21 PPM lower134 indexed ZIP readings · Range 3–1400 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Gaston
Is tap water safe in Gaston?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.