Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Ashland, WI 54806

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Ashland County.

Historical measurement record needs context
Largest possible serving system
Ashland Water Utility
Source water
Surface water
County
Ashland County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

1 system

Serves 8,000 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Ashland Water Utility

WI8020373 · Surface water · 8,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (4)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0065 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

43% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jun 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level
Reported level
1.4 mg/L
Action level
1.3 mg/L

108% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1992 to Dec 31, 1992

TTHM

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation
Reported level
87.4 UG/L
Maximum contaminant level
0.08 UG/L

109250% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024

Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation
Reported level
69.5 UG/L
Maximum contaminant level
0.06 UG/L

115833% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024

Violation history (13)
Imported violation history for Ashland Water Utility
RuleStatusPeriod
Public NoticeResolvedMar 11, 2024 to Oct 11, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 27, 2024 to May 29, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 27, 2024 to May 29, 2024
TTHMHealth-basedArchivedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleHealth-basedResolvedJan 1, 2024 to Aug 8, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-basedArchivedJan 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Health-basedArchivedOct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
TTHMHealth-basedArchivedOct 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedAug 29, 2023 to Nov 14, 2023
TTHMHealth-basedArchivedJul 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2023
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedMay 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Jun 10, 2024
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Feb 8, 2022

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Moderately Hard

PPM

73.9

GPG

4.3

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

73.9 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

73.9

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

4.3

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

1

Nearest site

8.4 mi

Observation range

Feb 3, 2021–Feb 3, 2021

Regional evidence confidence

Low

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: BAD RIVER NEAR ODANAH, WI (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 54806 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Ashland median

74 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 73.9–73.9 PPM

Wisconsin median

278 PPM

204 PPM lower

318 indexed ZIP readings · Range 69–824 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Ashland

Is tap water safe in Ashland?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.