Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Keyser, WV 26726

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Mineral County.

No active health-based violation reported
Largest possible serving system
Keyser City Of
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Mineral County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Utility match

2 systems

Serves 4,796 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Keyser City Of

WV3302915 · Surface water · 4,796 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0017 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

11% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (6)
Imported violation history for Keyser City Of
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedJul 1, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
TTHMArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Surface Water Treatment RuleArchivedJan 1, 2021 to Jan 31, 2021
ChlorineArchivedJan 1, 2021 to Mar 31, 2021
Lead and Copper RuleUnaddressedJan 1, 2019

Fountain Psd

WV3302942 · Groundwater · 1,001 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0043 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

29% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023

Violation history (74)
Imported violation history for Fountain Psd
RuleStatusPeriod
Public NoticeResolvedAug 12, 2023 to Feb 12, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedMay 6, 2023 to Feb 12, 2024
Public NoticeResolvedFeb 15, 2023 to Feb 12, 2024
Revised Total Coliform RuleResolvedFeb 1, 2023 to Feb 28, 2023
ChlorineResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023
Public NoticeResolvedNov 16, 2022 to Feb 12, 2024
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Vinyl chlorideResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
TrichloroethyleneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
BenzeneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
TolueneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
EthylbenzeneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
StyreneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Xylenes, TotalResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedJul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Radium-228ResolvedApr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Radium-228ResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
NitrateResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Vinyl chlorideResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
TolueneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
EthylbenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Radium-228ResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
BHC-GAMMAResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
PicloramResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
HexachlorocyclopentadieneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Heptachlor epoxideResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
2,4-DResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Benzo(a)pyreneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
StyreneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
ChlordaneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
AtrazineResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
MethoxychlorResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
OXAMYLResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
HeptachlorResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Xylenes, TotalResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipateResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
SimazineResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
TrichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
BenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
CarbofuranResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
LASSOResolvedOct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Public NoticeResolvedAug 14, 2021 to Feb 12, 2024
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ResolvedJul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Consumer Confidence RuleUnaddressedOct 1, 2018

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Hard

PPM

172

GPG

10.1

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

172 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

172

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

10.1

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

12

Nearest site

10.6 mi

Observation range

Oct 18, 2016–Sep 24, 2025

Regional evidence confidence

Moderate

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: ABRAM CREEK AT OAKMONT, WV (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 26726 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Keyser median

172 PPM

About the same

1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 172–172 PPM

West Virginia median

141 PPM

31 PPM higher

169 indexed ZIP readings · Range 17.8–414 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Keyser

Is tap water safe in Keyser?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.