City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Moorefield, West Virginia.
Median indexed hardness
225PPM
2 indexed ZIPs
Range 222.5–228 PPM
City summary
Moorefield has 2 published ZIP profiles across Hardy County. The indexed median is 225 PPM, compared with 141 PPM across West Virginia.
Among the 179 West Virginiacities with an indexed median, Moorefield ranks #18from highest to lowest. Across all 219 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 85.5to 265 PPM.
The 222.5–228 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
2 of 2 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: Jan 11, 2016 to Jun 30, 2026.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
Public water systems
PWSID WV3301601
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301607
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301608
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301610
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301611
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301415
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301605
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301613
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID WV3301612
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | WV3301613 | Feb 1, 2026 | Archived |
| Lead and Copper Rule | WV3301415 | Jan 1, 2026 | Unaddressed |
| Chlorine | WV3301415 | Nov 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Surface Water Treatment Rule | WV3301415 | Nov 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | WV3301415 | Nov 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Lead and Copper Rule | WV3301415 | Jul 1, 2025 | Unaddressed |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | WV3301415 | Jan 1, 2025 | Archived |
| TTHM | WV3301415 | Jan 1, 2025 | Archived |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | WV3301613 | Jul 1, 2023 | Unaddressed |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | WV3301612 | Jul 1, 2023 | Resolved |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 225 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.