Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Mullens, WV 25882
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Wyoming County.
1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
- Largest possible serving system
- Eastern Wyoming Psd Stephenson Wtp
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Wyoming County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
1 system
Serves 3,616 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Eastern Wyoming Psd Stephenson Wtp
WV3305521 · Groundwater · 3,616 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 6.5e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
4% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (66)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Mar 13, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Dec 30, 2025 |
| Groundwater Rule | Archived | Dec 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 15, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 15, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 15, 2025 |
| Groundwater RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Nov 2, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Aug 16, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Aug 16, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Aug 16, 2025 |
| Chlordane | Archived | Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025 |
| Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) | Archived | Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025 |
| Groundwater Rule | Resolved | Jun 15, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025 |
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Groundwater Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Jan 31, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2024 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| OXAMYL | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Picloram | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Atrazine | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Heptachlor epoxide | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Chlordane | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| BHC-GAMMA | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Carbofuran | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Aug 29, 2024 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Simazine | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Methoxychlor | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| 2,4-D | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| LASSO | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Heptachlor | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 1, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Groundwater Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Dec 30, 2023 to Oct 30, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2023 to Nov 27, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Dec 30, 2022 to Apr 7, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 23, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 23, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Jan 6, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Dec 30, 2021 to Apr 7, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Dec 3, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 14, 2021 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Aug 3, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Aug 14, 2021 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | May 7, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Feb 14, 2021 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Dec 30, 2020 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2019 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2019 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2018 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2018 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | Nov 16, 2018 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
91.1
PPM as CaCO₃
Moderately Hard
PPM
91.1
GPG
5.3
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
91.1 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
91.1
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
5.3
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
20
Nearest site
2.2 mi
Observation range
Jul 12, 2016–Jul 11, 2017
Regional evidence confidence
Low
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: Wyo-0289 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 25882 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Mullens median
90 PPM
About the same2 indexed ZIP readings · Range 89.1–91.1 PPM
West Virginia median
141 PPM
50 PPM lower169 indexed ZIP readings · Range 17.8–414 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
More local profiles in Mullens
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Mullens
Is tap water safe in Mullens?+
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.