Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Rivesville, WV 26588
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Marion County.
1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
- Largest possible serving system
- Rivesville Town Of
- Source water
- Surface water
- County
- Marion County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
Review needed
1 active health-based record
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
3 systems
Serves 1,267 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Rivesville Town Of
WV3302519 · Surface water · 1,267 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 5.4e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
4% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (6)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2024 |
| Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts RuleHealth-based | Resolved | Dec 7, 2022 to Jun 27, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 24, 2021 to Dec 14, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Unaddressed | May 5, 2010 |
Ministers Run Water Assoc
WV3302514 · Surface water · 339 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (5)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| TTHM | Resolved | Oct 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2006 |
| Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts RuleHealth-based | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2004 |
Sugar Lane Water Assoc
WV3302520 · Surface water · 204 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 5.7e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
4% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (39)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Aug 11, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2024 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 14, 2023 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 14, 2023 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Feb 16, 2023 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Mar 31, 2023 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Dec 30, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 16, 2022 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 16, 2022 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Dec 29, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 13, 2022 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 13, 2022 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 30, 2022 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 14, 2021 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Nov 14, 2021 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Oct 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 15, 2021 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 15, 2021 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2021 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 14, 2021 to Nov 4, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021 |
| TTHM | Resolved | Apr 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2020 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2020 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2020 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 1, 2018 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2018 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Oct 1, 2017 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Jul 1, 2017 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Oct 1, 2016 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
198.5
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
198.5
GPG
11.6
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
198.5 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
198.5
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
11.6
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
6
Nearest site
15.5 mi
Observation range
Aug 12, 2025–Sep 22, 2025
Regional evidence confidence
Moderate
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: Dunkard Creek at Shannopin, PA (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 26588 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Rivesville median
199 PPM
About the same1 indexed ZIP readings · Range 198.5–198.5 PPM
West Virginia median
141 PPM
58 PPM higher169 indexed ZIP readings · Range 17.8–414 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Frequently asked
Water questions for Rivesville
Is tap water safe in Rivesville?+
EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.