City water profile

Water hardness in Greensboro

Find official utility reports, understand hardness, and check the water system serving your home in Greensboro, North Carolina.

Utility-reported hardness

Not yet available

Check your provider and source →

State comparison: Unavailable
Evidence comparison rank: —
Matched utilities: 10
Active health records: 0

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

Convert a hardness result →Test your tap →

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Greensboro, City Of

NC0241010 · Surface water · 319,588 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)

Imported violation history for Greensboro, City Of
Rule	Status	Period
Lead and Copper Rule	Resolved	Jan 1, 2025 to Sep 2, 2025
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule	Resolved	Nov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022

Crown Mhp

NC0241112 · Groundwater · 353 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (14)

Imported violation history for Crown Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2026
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Oct 1, 2025
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2025
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2024
Public Notice	Resolved	Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 4, 2026
Public Notice	Resolved	Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 4, 2026
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2023
Public Notice	Resolved	Oct 30, 2022 to Jun 4, 2026
Public Notice	Resolved	Oct 30, 2022 to Jun 4, 2026
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Feb 1, 2022 to Feb 28, 2022
Lead and Copper Rule	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Apr 7, 2022
Chlorine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Sep 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Chlorine	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021

Huntington Woods Mhp

NC0241111 · Groundwater · 300 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.013 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

87% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level

Reported level: 1.63 mg/L
Action level: 1.3 mg/L

125% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (25)

Imported violation history for Huntington Woods Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
Public Notice	Resolved	Aug 15, 2025 to Nov 5, 2025
Public Notice	Resolved	Aug 15, 2025 to Nov 5, 2025
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 25, 2025
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Chlorine	Resolved	Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024
Public Notice	Resolved	May 27, 2023 to Aug 10, 2023
Atrazine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
LASSO	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Simazine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Methoxychlor	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Heptachlor	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Benzo(a)pyrene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
HEXACHLOROBENZENE	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Endrin	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
BHC-GAMMA	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Heptachlor epoxide	Resolved	Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2022 to Nov 9, 2022
Chlorine	Resolved	Apr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Apr 1, 2022 to Apr 30, 2022
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2022
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021
Consumer Confidence Rule	Addressed	Jul 1, 2016

Springdale S/d

NC3041011 · Groundwater · 267 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Springdale S/d
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025

Huntcliff S/d

NC0241217 · Groundwater · 262 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.0017 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

11% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Staffordshire Estates

NC0241194 · Groundwater · 254 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Copper (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Above action level

Reported level: 4.6 mg/L
Action level: 1.3 mg/L

354% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2001 to Jun 30, 2001

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Staffordshire Estates
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024

Sterlingshire S/d

NC3041062 · Groundwater · 201 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0.002 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

13% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Sterlingshire S/d
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025

Monticello Estates

NC0241154 · Groundwater · 201 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Monticello Estates
Rule	Status	Period
Consumer Confidence Rule	Resolved	Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024

Monroe`s Mhp

NC0241126 · Groundwater · 187 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (34)

Imported violation history for Monroe`s Mhp
Rule	Status	Period
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based	Resolved	Oct 17, 2024 to Nov 13, 2024
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS	Resolved	Oct 17, 2024 to Nov 13, 2024
Lead and Copper Rule	Addressed	Jan 1, 2023
Public Notice	Resolved	Oct 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023
Public Notice	Resolved	Oct 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023
Public Notice	Resolved	Jul 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Feb 1, 2022 to Feb 28, 2022
Chlorine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022
Atrazine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
o-Dichlorobenzene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
p-Dichlorobenzene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,1-Dichloroethylene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,1,1-Trichloroethane	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Carbon tetrachloride	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,1,2-Trichloroethane	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Toluene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Ethylbenzene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Trichloroethylene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,2-Dichloroethane	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Styrene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Xylenes, Total	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
CHLOROBENZENE	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Tetrachloroethylene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
DICHLOROMETHANE	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Benzene	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
1,2-Dichloropropane	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Vinyl chloride	Resolved	Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022
Revised Total Coliform Rule	Resolved	Sep 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Chlorine	Resolved	Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021
Atrazine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021
Atrazine	Resolved	Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021

Ashcroft Park

NC3041103 · Groundwater · 175 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →

Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level

Reported level: 0 mg/L
Action level: 0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)

Imported violation history for Ashcroft Park
Rule	Status	Period
Public Notice	Resolved	Jan 30, 2021 to Jun 8, 2021

City summary

What the indexed records say

Greensboro has 12 published ZIP profiles across Guilford County. No qualifying nearby hardness observation is available for the city.

The —–— PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.

Hardness distribution

How local ZIP estimates compare

Soft0 ZIPs

Moderately hard0 ZIPs

Hard0 ZIPs

Very hard0 ZIPs

0 of 12 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.

Evidence quality

Distance, dates, and confidence

Median nearest distance: — miles
Profiles with evidence: 0/12

Confidence labels

High: 0Moderate: 0Low: 0

1. Open your ZIP. Check distance, dates, confidence, and the associated utility.
2. Read the current CCR. Confirm source water, detections, limits, ranges, and notices.
3. Use a measured hardness result. Confirm health concerns or treatment sizing with the right method.

Continue comparing

Other North Carolina communities

Gibsonville

Guilford County

21 PPM median

High Point

Guilford County

— No median

Oak Ridge

Guilford County

— No median

Pleasant Garden

Guilford County

— No median

Summerfield

Guilford County

— No median

Whitsett

Guilford County

— No median

Search all 381 North Carolina cities →

Questions people ask

About water in Greensboro

Is the water hard?

Check the utility-reported result above when available. Nearby environmental samples cannot establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Is the tap water safe?

Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.

Do I need treatment?

Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.