Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Greensboro, NC 27410
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Guilford County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Greensboro, City Of
- Source water
- Surface water + Groundwater
- County
- Guilford County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
10 systems
Serves 319,588 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Greensboro, City Of
NC0241010 · Surface water · 319,588 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2025 to Sep 2, 2025 |
| Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022 |
Crown Mhp
NC0241112 · Groundwater · 353 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (14)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2026 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Oct 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 4, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Apr 1, 2023 to Jun 4, 2026 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Oct 30, 2022 to Jun 4, 2026 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Oct 30, 2022 to Jun 4, 2026 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Feb 1, 2022 to Feb 28, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Apr 7, 2022 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
Huntington Woods Mhp
NC0241111 · Groundwater · 300 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.013 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
87% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.63 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
125% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (25)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 15, 2025 to Nov 5, 2025 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Aug 15, 2025 to Nov 5, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 25, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jun 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2024 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | May 27, 2023 to Aug 10, 2023 |
| Atrazine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| LASSO | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Simazine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Methoxychlor | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Heptachlor | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| HEXACHLOROBENZENE | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Endrin | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| BHC-GAMMA | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Heptachlor epoxide | Resolved | Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2022 to Nov 9, 2022 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Apr 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Apr 1, 2022 to Apr 30, 2022 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Addressed | Jul 1, 2016 |
Springdale S/d
NC3041011 · Groundwater · 267 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025 |
Huntcliff S/d
NC0241217 · Groundwater · 262 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0017 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
11% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (0)
No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.
Staffordshire Estates
NC0241194 · Groundwater · 254 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 4.6 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
354% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2001 to Jun 30, 2001
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024 |
Sterlingshire S/d
NC3041062 · Groundwater · 201 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.002 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Jan 29, 2025 |
Monticello Estates
NC0241154 · Groundwater · 201 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Dec 3, 2024 |
Monroe`s Mhp
NC0241126 · Groundwater · 187 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (34)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-based | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Nov 13, 2024 |
| LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Resolved | Oct 17, 2024 to Nov 13, 2024 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Addressed | Jan 1, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Oct 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Oct 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023 |
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jul 30, 2022 to Aug 9, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Feb 1, 2022 to Feb 28, 2022 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Mar 31, 2022 |
| Atrazine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Toluene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Ethylbenzene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Trichloroethylene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Styrene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Xylenes, Total | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| CHLOROBENZENE | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| DICHLOROMETHANE | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Benzene | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Vinyl chloride | Resolved | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Sep 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
| Chlorine | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 |
| Atrazine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
| Atrazine | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 |
Ashcroft Park
NC3041103 · Groundwater · 175 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Public Notice | Resolved | Jan 30, 2021 to Jun 8, 2021 |
Hardness estimate unavailable
No responsible local estimate yet
We did not find enough qualifying recent USGS hardness observations within 25 miles of this ZIP centroid. We leave the value blank instead of substituting a state average. Ask the serving utility or test the household tap for a property-specific result.
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Ask the utility for hardness or test at the tap. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and targeted analysis.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
More local profiles in Greensboro
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Greensboro
Is tap water safe in Greensboro?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.