Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Raleigh, NC 27697

Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Wake County.

1 active health-based record(s) across possible systems
Largest possible serving system
Raleigh, City Of
Source water
Surface water + Groundwater
County
Wake County
Profile updated

Your tap water

What does the utility report?

Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.

Utility hardness unavailable in this index

Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.

Find an official utility report →

At a glance

What the current records say

Utility-reported hardness

Unavailable

Ask your provider or test your tap

All possible systems

Review needed

1 active health-based record

Utility match

10 systems

Serves 650,000 people system-wide

Match the name on your water bill

Your utility’s measurements and compliance records

These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.

EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.

Raleigh, City Of

NC0392010 · Surface water · 650,000 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Bayleaf Master

NC0392373 · Groundwater · 16,715 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jul 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (9)
Imported violation history for Bayleaf Master
RuleStatusPeriod
Combined UraniumResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)ResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Radium-228ResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Radium-226ResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and UResolvedApr 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2025
Combined UraniumResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2024
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 11, 2024
NitrateResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023
NitrateArchivedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Stonehenge S/d

NC0392298 · Groundwater · 1,840 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Stonehenge S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 4, 2024
NitrateResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Royal Senter Ridge S/d

NC4392140 · Groundwater · 740 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for Royal Senter Ridge S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 13, 2024
NitrateResolvedJan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023

Mallards Crossing S/d

NC0392356 · Groundwater · 709 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Mallards Crossing S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 10, 2024

Myatt Mill S/d

NC0392085 · Groundwater · 676 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Myatt Mill S/d
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 9, 2024

Lynnhaven-Crowsdale

NC0392253 · Groundwater · 650 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0.0056 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

37% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (0)

No record returned in this imported window. This is not a guarantee of tap-water safety.

Glendale Master System

NC0392293 · Groundwater · 633 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (22)
Imported violation history for Glendale Master System
RuleStatusPeriod
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Xylenes, TotalResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Carbon tetrachlorideResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2-DichloropropaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
BenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TolueneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
EthylbenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TrichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
StyreneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
o-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Vinyl chlorideResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1-DichloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
TetrachloroethyleneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
p-DichlorobenzeneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
CHLOROBENZENEResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
DICHLOROMETHANEResolvedOct 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 10, 2024

All Star Mhp

NC0392102 · Groundwater · 530 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

1 reported active health-based record(s) for this system

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (2)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Combined Radium (-226 and -228)

EPA SDWIS reported health-based violation

Reported violation
Reported level
6 PCI/L
Maximum contaminant level
5 PCI/L

120% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Apr 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026

Violation history (2)
Imported violation history for All Star Mhp
RuleStatusPeriod
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)Health-basedAddressedApr 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026
Lead and Copper RuleResolvedJan 1, 2022 to Mar 16, 2022

Briarwood/kildaire

NC0392383 · Groundwater · 517 people served system-wide

The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.

No active health-based record in this imported snapshot

Find this utility’s official report →
Measurements (1)

An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.

Lead (90th percentile)

EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples

Below action level
Reported level
0 mg/L
Action level
0.015 mg/L

0% of the listed benchmark

Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2025

Violation history (1)
Imported violation history for Briarwood/kildaire
RuleStatusPeriod
Consumer Confidence RuleResolvedJul 1, 2024 to Dec 11, 2024

Hardness meter

What does nearby environmental evidence show?

Soft

PPM

51

GPG

3

Regional environmental evidence

USGS hardness classification scale

51 PPM

Soft
0–60
Moderate
61–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

51

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

3

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

How to use regional evidence

These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.

USGS sites used

38

Nearest site

1 mi

Observation range

Jul 12, 2016–Jun 1, 2026

Regional evidence confidence

High

Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: WATSON BRANCH BELOW BRAGG STREET AT RALEIGH, NC (Stream).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.

Regional context

Is 27697 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Raleigh median

47 PPM

About the same

17 indexed ZIP readings · Range 29.8–55.4 PPM

North Carolina median

45 PPM

6 PPM higher

247 indexed ZIP readings · Range 3.1–269 PPM

Evidence-first next steps

Confirm the problem before choosing treatment

This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.

1

Confirm the serving system

ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.

2

Read the current utility report

An active health-based record is present. Follow the utility's current notice and public-health instructions.

Find an official utility report →
3

Test for the decision you face

Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.

Convert your hardness test result →

Nearby indexed reports

More local profiles in Raleigh

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Raleigh reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Raleigh

Is tap water safe in Raleigh?+

EPA ECHO reports 1 active health-based violation among the associated community water systems. Review the affected utility's current notice and Consumer Confidence Report.

How hard is the water?+

Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.

Do I need a water softener?+

Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.