Utility-reported hardness
Unavailable
Ask your provider or test your tap
Local water dashboard
Official source aggregationWater quality in Orlando, FL 32812
Regional hardness evidence, possible serving systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Orange County.
Historical measurement record needs context
- Largest possible serving system
- Orlando Utilities Commission
- Source water
- Groundwater
- County
- Orange County
- Profile updated
Your tap water
What does the utility report?
Match the utility name to your water bill. These results describe the utility’s water, not a test at your home. A ZIP can include several water systems.
Utility hardness unavailable in this index
Nearby river or groundwater samples cannot tell us the hardness coming out of your tap. Ask your water provider for total hardness as CaCO₃, or test it at home.
Find an official utility report →At a glance
What the current records say
EPA quarter 2026Q2
All possible systems
No active flag
0 active health-based records
Measurements by utility
Each result belongs to a specific system.
Utility match
10 systems
Serves 536,466 people system-wide
Match the name on your water bill
Your utility’s measurements and compliance records
These are possible serving systems. A record for one system does not apply to every home in this ZIP. Confirm your provider before interpreting a measurement or notice. Federal records can lag current utility notices.
EPA snapshot: 2026Q2. Historical window begins Jan 1, 2021.
Orlando Utilities Commission
FL3480962 · Groundwater · 536,466 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.002 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Apr 1, 2025 to Apr 30, 2025 |
Ocud/eastern Water System (2 Wp)
FL3484132 · Groundwater · 293,374 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 9.0e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
6% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 1, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.5 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
115% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1992 to Dec 31, 1992
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022 |
Ocud/western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps)
FL3481546 · Groundwater · 206,742 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 8.0e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
5% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Jun 1, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.756 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
135% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1992 to Dec 31, 1992
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Apr 1, 2025 to Apr 30, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Nov 1, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Nov 1, 2022 to Nov 30, 2022 |
| Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule | Unaddressed | Oct 2, 2006 |
Ocud/southern Water Sys (5 Wps)
FL3484119 · Groundwater · 80,738 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0016 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
11% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 1, 2025
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.408 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
108% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1992 to Dec 31, 1992
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Aug 1, 2025 to Aug 31, 2025 |
University Of Central Florida
FL3480409 · Groundwater · 44,103 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0047 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
31% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 1.75 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
135% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jul 1, 1998 to Dec 31, 1998
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| E. COLI | Archived | Feb 1, 2025 to Feb 28, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jan 1, 2021 to Jan 31, 2021 |
Flamingo Crossing (consec.)
FL3484437 · Groundwater · 9,704 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0024 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
16% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
Violation history (1)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Nov 1, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023 |
Pluris-Wedgefield Inc
FL3480149 · Groundwater · 6,157 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (2)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.002 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
13% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
Copper (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 2.4 mg/L
- Action level
- 1.3 mg/L
185% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2000 to Jun 30, 2000
Violation history (4)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Jul 1, 2025 to Jul 31, 2025 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Archived | Feb 1, 2025 to Feb 28, 2025 |
| E. COLI | Unaddressed | Aug 1, 2012 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2002 |
Taft Water Association
FL3481326 · Groundwater · 4,232 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0.0053 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
35% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 1, 2023
Violation history (5)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | Archived | Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2024 to Nov 12, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Resolved | Oct 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved | Jul 1, 2021 to Nov 9, 2022 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved | Jun 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2021 |
Starlight Ranch Mobile Home Estates
FL3481270 · Groundwater · 1,221 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 8.0e-4 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
5% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
Violation history (2)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2025 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed | Jan 1, 2022 |
Crescent Heights S/d(consec)
FL3480255 · Groundwater · 969 people served system-wide
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
No active health-based record in this imported snapshot
Find this utility’s official report →Measurements (1)
An action level is a regulatory trigger, not a pass/fail health boundary. A reported zero is the value in the source record and does not establish that lead is absent at your tap.
Lead (90th percentile)
EPA SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule samples
- Reported level
- 0 mg/L
- Action level
- 0.015 mg/L
0% of the listed benchmark
Monitoring period: Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 1, 2024
Violation history (3)
| Rule | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Unaddressed | Jul 1, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
| TTHM | Archived | Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 |
Hardness meter
What does nearby environmental evidence show?
374
PPM as CaCO₃
Very Hard
PPM
374
GPG
21.9
Regional environmental evidence
USGS hardness classification scale
374 PPM
Soft
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
0–60Moderate
61–120Hard
121–180Very hard
181+
Parts per million
374
mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent
Grains per gallon
21.9
1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM
How to use regional evidence
These samples describe nearby environmental water. They cannot establish whether your tap water is soft or hard. Use a utility result or a tap test for appliance settings and treatment sizing.
USGS sites used
45
Nearest site
4.6 mi
Observation range
May 11, 2021–May 27, 2026
Regional evidence confidence
High
Median of the latest source-type-aligned hardness observation at each monitoring site within 25 miles. Nearest monitoring location: ORANGE WELL NO. 7 AAK1369 (Well).USGS source documentation ↗Evidence tier: Regional environmental evidence. This value is not used as proof of the serving utility's treated-water hardness.
Regional context
Is 32812 typical?
These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.
Orlando median
374 PPM
About the same16 indexed ZIP readings · Range 371–374.5 PPM
Florida median
280 PPM
94 PPM higher498 indexed ZIP readings · Range 42.2–2300 PPM
Evidence-first next steps
Confirm the problem before choosing treatment
This profile can help you ask the right question. It cannot select equipment for a property without a current result from the serving utility or the tap.
Confirm the serving system
ZIP boundaries and utility service areas do not perfectly match. Verify the system on a water bill before relying on system-wide records.
Read the current utility report
A reported action-level record needs context. Check its monitoring period and the utility's current report.
Find an official utility report →Test for the decision you face
Use a tap hardness test before sizing a softener. For health concerns, use a certified laboratory and the correct sampling protocol.
Convert your hardness test result →Nearby indexed reports
More local profiles in Orlando
Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.
Frequently asked
Water questions for Orlando
Is tap water safe in Orlando?+
EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.
How hard is the water?+
Utility-reported hardness is unavailable in this index. Regional samples do not establish tap-water hardness. Ask your provider or test your tap.
Do I need a water softener?+
Confirm hardness at your tap and consider actual scale or spotting before choosing treatment. Regional environmental values cannot determine whether you need a softener. A softener addresses hardness, not every contaminant.