City water profile
Compare local ZIP estimates, evidence quality, associated public systems, and compliance history for Jacksonville, North Carolina.
Median indexed hardness
183PPM
6 indexed ZIPs
Range 183–183.5 PPM
City summary
Jacksonville has 6 published ZIP profiles across Onslow County. The indexed median is 183 PPM, compared with 41 PPM across North Carolina.
Among the 381 North Carolinacities with an indexed median, Jacksonville ranks #48from highest to lowest. Across all 519 state ZIP profiles, available estimates run from 4.7to 267.5 PPM.
The 183–183.5 PPM range shows how much the available ZIP estimates vary within the city label.
Hardness distribution
6 of 6 ZIP profiles have a hardness estimate. Bars count ZIP profiles, not households or laboratory samples.
Evidence quality
Confidence labels
Observation window: May 8, 2017 to Sep 11, 2024.
ZIP directory
Open a ZIP for site-level provenance and measurements.
ZIP code
183.5 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
183 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
183 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
183 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
183.5 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
ZIP code
183.5 PPM
View full ZIP evidence →
Public water systems
PWSID NC0467035
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467010
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467136
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467222
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467103
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467102
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC7067007
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467224
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
PWSID NC0467229
The system names this served city; Census place overlap links the city to this ZCTA.
Compliance history
No active health-based violation appears among the associated systems in the represented EPA reporting quarter. This does not mean every contaminant was tested at every tap.
| Record | System | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | NC7067007 | Apr 1, 2026 | Addressed |
| TTHM | NC7067007 | Apr 1, 2026 | Addressed |
| Public Notice | NC0467224 | Dec 18, 2025 | Resolved |
| Public Notice | NC0467222 | Sep 21, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NC0467103 | Sep 11, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NC0467102 | Sep 11, 2025 | Resolved |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | NC0467103 | Aug 11, 2025 | Resolved |
| Public Notice | NC0467222 | Jul 19, 2025 | Resolved |
| Public Notice | NC0467224 | Jul 19, 2025 | Resolved |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | NC0467222 | Jul 1, 2025 | Resolved |
Practical next steps
Continue comparing
Questions people ask
The indexed city median is 183 PPM. Open the ZIP report to verify the distance and confidence behind that estimate.
Compliance history is utility-wide and cannot guarantee conditions at every tap. Check current notices and test when address-specific evidence is needed.
Choose treatment only after confirming the problem at the property. A softener targets hardness; contaminant treatment requires a matching, verified performance claim.