Skip to content

Local water dashboard

Official source aggregation

Water quality in Jacksonville, NC 28547

A source-transparent look at local hardness, associated public water systems, EPA compliance history, and the measurements that are—and are not—available for Onslow County.

2 reported benchmark flags
Primary matched system
Onslow Wtr And Sewer Authority
Source water
Groundwater
County
Onslow County
Profile updated

At a glance

What the current records say

Hardness

Very Hard

183.5 PPM · 10.7 GPG

Compliance screen

No active flag

0 active health-based records

Lead 90th percentile

0 mg/L

0% of action level

Utility match

9 systems

Serves 156,755 people system-wide

Hardness meter

How hard is the water?

Very Hard

Estimated local hardness

USGS hardness classification scale

183.5 PPM

Soft
0–59
Moderate
60–120
Hard
121–180
Very hard
181+

Parts per million

183.5

mg/L as CaCO₃ equivalent

Grains per gallon

10.7

1 GPG ≈ 17.1 PPM

What this means at home

At 183.5 PPM, mineral scale can build up on fixtures and heating elements, reduce soap lather, and leave visible spotting. Hardness is primarily an aesthetic and appliance concern—not itself a tap-water safety rating.

USGS sites used

106

Nearest site

7.8 mi

Observation range

May 8, 2017–Sep 11, 2024

Estimate confidence

Moderate

Median of the latest qualifying hardness observation at each nearby monitoring site. Nearest monitoring location: ON-309 MAS-25 AT HUBERT, NC (Well).USGS source documentation ↗

Regional context

Is 28547 typical?

These comparisons use other indexed ZIP estimates, not utility tap samples. They help show local context without replacing a household test.

Jacksonville median

183 PPM

About the same

6 indexed ZIP readings · Range 183–183.5 PPM

North Carolina median

41 PPM

143 PPM higher

519 indexed ZIP readings · Range 4.7–267.5 PPM

EPA benchmark screen

Contaminant snapshot

Available numerical results from associated SDWIS community water systems, compared with the applicable action level or federal MCL. Federal measured-value coverage is incomplete.

1 pass2 fail

Lead (PB90)

0 mg/L

Reported Dec 31, 2025

Copper (CU90)

2.261 mg/L

Reported Dec 31, 2021

Numerical coverage

3 comparable results

Missing values remain blank; absence is not treated as a pass.

Lead (90th percentile)

Measured in mg/L

Pass

Local 0

EPA limit 0.015

Local level is 0% of the listed EPA limit.

Copper (90th percentile)

Measured in mg/L

Fail

Local 2.261

EPA limit 1.3

Local level is 174% of the listed EPA limit.

TTHM

Measured in MG/L

Fail

Local 0.081

EPA limit 0.08

Local level is 101% of the listed EPA limit.

Share of EPA benchmark

100% line = listed limit

EPA SDWIS compliance

Reported violation history

Open EPA source documentation ↗
2026Q2
All records
118
Health-based
10
Active health-based
0
Contaminant or ruleSystemStatusPeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)NC7067007AddressedApr 1, 2026through Jun 30, 2026
TTHMNC7067007AddressedApr 1, 2026through Jun 30, 2026
Public NoticeNC0467224ResolvedDec 18, 2025through Feb 12, 2026
Public NoticeNC0467222ResolvedSep 21, 2025through Feb 12, 2026
Revised Total Coliform RuleNC0467103ResolvedSep 11, 2025through Oct 15, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleNC0467102ResolvedSep 11, 2025through Oct 23, 2025
Revised Total Coliform RuleNC0467103ResolvedAug 11, 2025through Aug 11, 2025
Public NoticeNC0467222ResolvedJul 19, 2025through Feb 12, 2026
Public NoticeNC0467224ResolvedJul 19, 2025through Feb 12, 2026
Consumer Confidence RuleNC0467222ResolvedJul 1, 2025through Jul 3, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)NC0467102ResolvedJul 1, 2025through Sep 30, 2025
TTHMNC0467102ResolvedJul 1, 2025through Sep 30, 2025
Consumer Confidence RuleNC0467224ResolvedJul 1, 2025through Aug 12, 2025
TTHMNC0467102AddressedApr 6, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleNC0467103ResolvedJan 1, 2025through Aug 15, 2025
Lead and Copper RuleNC0467102ResolvedJan 1, 2025through Nov 19, 2025
Public NoticeNC0467035ResolvedOct 28, 2024through Dec 18, 2024
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-basedNC0467035ResolvedOct 17, 2024through Nov 7, 2024
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSNC0467035ResolvedOct 17, 2024through Nov 7, 2024
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSHealth-basedNC0467010ResolvedOct 17, 2024through Oct 17, 2024

No reported violation does not prove that every contaminant was tested or absent; SDWIS measured values are incomplete and lag state records.

Solutions matcher

Your personalized water action plan

Matched to Jacksonville ZIP 28547 using 183.5 PPM nearby hardness and 3 reported measurement benchmarks.

2 matches

Scale protection

High-Capacity Whole House Water Softener

183.5 PPM is 2× the high-hardness trigger used by this matcher.

Designed to reduce scale on fixtures, water heaters, glassware, and plumbing throughout the home.

Compare whole-house systems

Drinking water protection

Under-Sink Reverse Osmosis System

Copper (90th percentile), TTHM have a measured benchmark flag or active health-based SDWIS record in this profile.

A certified multi-stage RO system targets a broader range of dissolved contaminants at the kitchen tap.

Explore under-sink filtration

Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases, at no added cost to you. Product matching is educational and does not replace certified water testing.

Nearby indexed reports

Compare ZIPs in Jacksonville

Estimates can differ across a city because monitoring locations and associated systems differ.

View all Jacksonville reports →

Frequently asked

Water questions for Jacksonville

Is tap water safe in Jacksonville?+

EPA ECHO shows no active health-based violation for the associated systems in this reporting snapshot. This does not prove every contaminant is absent; federal records can lag and household plumbing can change tap conditions.

How hard is the water?+

Nearby USGS observations produce an estimate of 183.5 PPM, or 10.7 grains per gallon, classified as very hard. This is not a household tap measurement.

Do I need a water softener?+

At 183.5 PPM, a correctly sized whole-house softener can reduce scale and hard-water spotting. It does not replace contaminant filtration.